Establishing an AI-based artifact correction system for intrarenal pressure monitoring using the LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope: an EAU endourology and AUSET collaboration

Intrarenal pressure (IRP) management during endoscopic surgery for urolithiasis is critical to minimize postoperative pain and infectious complications. However, pressure sensors at the ureteroscope tip often register various artifacts when contacting the pelvicalyceal or ureteral wall, leading to significant deviations from true IRP values. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model to detect and remove artifacts from IRP data accurately. We analyzed 27 retrograde intrarenal surgeries performed using the Boston Scientific® LithoVue™ Elite system across academic institutions in Japan and Hong Kong. 32 waveform features were identified and three tree-based machine learning models—Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM—were trained for automated artifact detection. Endpoints included agreement with ground-truth labels and comparison of time efficiency between artificial intelligence (AI)-based and manual annotations. The best-performing model achieved an overall agreement of 93.6% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95. Each case included 94 artifacts, contributing 258 s per surgery. Artifacts accounted for 31% of the time > 30 mmHg and 72% of the time > 100 mmHg. Without correction, peak IRP was overestimated by 184 mmHg (median, 257 vs. 73 mmHg). False negatives > 60 mmHg had a median 0.0 s per case. AI-based IRP annotation saved 99.95% of the time compared to manual review (1.8 s vs. 56.6 min per case). The model successfully achieved high-precision artifact removal from IRP data. This system may serve as a standardized process for accurate IRP analysis during endoscopic surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Urology
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-06057-7
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing an AI-based artifact correction system for intrarenal pressure monitoring using the LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope: an EAU endourology and AUSET collaboration

Kazumi Taguchi, Takahiro Yanase, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Ryosuke Chaya et al.
World Journal of Urology
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Establishing an AI-based artifact correction system for intrarenal pressure monitoring using the LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope: an EAU endourology and AUSET collaboration

Kazumi Taguchi, Takahiro Yanase, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Ryosuke Chaya, Olivier Traxer, Yuya Sasaki, Takahiro Yasui, Atsushi Okada, Rei Unno, Bhaskar K. Somani, Vineet Gauhar
article en

Abstract

Intrarenal pressure (IRP) management during endoscopic surgery for urolithiasis is critical to minimize postoperative pain and infectious complications. However, pressure sensors at the ureteroscope tip often register various artifacts when contacting the pelvicalyceal or ureteral wall, leading to significant deviations from true IRP values. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model to detect and remove artifacts from IRP data accurately. We analyzed 27 retrograde intrarenal surgeries performed using the Boston Scientific® LithoVue™ Elite system across academic institutions in Japan and Hong Kong. 32 waveform features were identified and three tree-based machine learning models—Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM—were trained for automated artifact detection. Endpoints included agreement with ground-truth labels and comparison of time efficiency between artificial intelligence (AI)-based and manual annotations. The best-performing model achieved an overall agreement of 93.6% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95. Each case included 94 artifacts, contributing 258 s per surgery. Artifacts accounted for 31% of the time > 30 mmHg and 72% of the time > 100 mmHg. Without correction, peak IRP was overestimated by 184 mmHg (median, 257 vs. 73 mmHg). False negatives > 60 mmHg had a median 0.0 s per case. AI-based IRP annotation saved 99.95% of the time compared to manual review (1.8 s vs. 56.6 min per case). The model successfully achieved high-precision artifact removal from IRP data. This system may serve as a standardized process for accurate IRP analysis during endoscopic surgery.

World Journal of UrologyVol. 43(1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (SG), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Nagoya City University (JP), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (IN), Hôpital Tenon (FR), Analyse, Recherche, Développement et Evaluation en Endourologie et Lithiase Urinaire (FR), The University of Osaka (JP)
Nagoya City University
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.