The Global Spatial Co‐Variation Between Crop Diversity and Landscape Heterogeneity

The influence of crop and landscape heterogeneity on different components of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes has been assessed at multiple scales. However, how crop species diversity relates to landscape heterogeneity remains underexplored at the global scale. We apply independent global spatial datasets to test the relationship between crop and landscape heterogeneity across 19,505 agricultural landscapes worldwide. We first examine the spatial patterns in crop diversity and landscape diversity (compositional heterogeneity), defined as the effective number of crop species and land cover types, respectively, based on Shannon entropy. Median crop diversity increases on average by 0.36-0.48 effective species for each unit increase in land cover diversity globally. We use quantile generalized additive models (QGAM) to statistically test this relationship. The QGAM approach confirms that crop diversity has a positive but complex relationship with landscape diversity, particularly for landscapes with ≥ 4-5 non-crop cover types. However, this positive trend is context-dependent, as the clearest median response generally corresponds to landscapes with moderate cropland extents (25%-75% cropland). We also examine how other components of landscape compositional and configurational heterogeneity, including dominant agricultural field size and patch size, as well as topographic heterogeneity are associated with crop diversity. The relatively highest crop diversity tends to correspond to very small dominant agricultural field sizes (crop configurational heterogeneity) when controlling for cropland extent and non-agricultural land cover diversity. Mean patch area (landscape configurational heterogeneity) has a strong negative association with crop diversity until patch sizes of > 150 km<sup>2</sup> while topographic heterogeneity has a consistent positive association with crop diversity. Our findings therefore demonstrate how the diversity of non-agricultural land covers in conjunction with configurational heterogeneity has relevance to understanding existing patterns of spatial crop diversity. Such insights could help inform efforts to design more multifunctional agricultural landscapes, including landscape-scale farm diversification strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70583
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Global Spatial Co‐Variation Between Crop Diversity and Landscape Heterogeneity

Graham K. MacDonald, Erin H. Gleeson
Global Change Biology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

The Global Spatial Co‐Variation Between Crop Diversity and Landscape Heterogeneity

Graham K. MacDonald, Erin H. Gleeson
article en

Abstract

The influence of crop and landscape heterogeneity on different components of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes has been assessed at multiple scales. However, how crop species diversity relates to landscape heterogeneity remains underexplored at the global scale. We apply independent global spatial datasets to test the relationship between crop and landscape heterogeneity across 19,505 agricultural landscapes worldwide. We first examine the spatial patterns in crop diversity and landscape diversity (compositional heterogeneity), defined as the effective number of crop species and land cover types, respectively, based on Shannon entropy. Median crop diversity increases on average by 0.36-0.48 effective species for each unit increase in land cover diversity globally. We use quantile generalized additive models (QGAM) to statistically test this relationship. The QGAM approach confirms that crop diversity has a positive but complex relationship with landscape diversity, particularly for landscapes with ≥ 4-5 non-crop cover types. However, this positive trend is context-dependent, as the clearest median response generally corresponds to landscapes with moderate cropland extents (25%-75% cropland). We also examine how other components of landscape compositional and configurational heterogeneity, including dominant agricultural field size and patch size, as well as topographic heterogeneity are associated with crop diversity. The relatively highest crop diversity tends to correspond to very small dominant agricultural field sizes (crop configurational heterogeneity) when controlling for cropland extent and non-agricultural land cover diversity. Mean patch area (landscape configurational heterogeneity) has a strong negative association with crop diversity until patch sizes of > 150 km<sup>2</sup> while topographic heterogeneity has a consistent positive association with crop diversity. Our findings therefore demonstrate how the diversity of non-agricultural land covers in conjunction with configurational heterogeneity has relevance to understanding existing patterns of spatial crop diversity. Such insights could help inform efforts to design more multifunctional agricultural landscapes, including landscape-scale farm diversification strategies.

Global Change BiologyVol. 31(11)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.