How Visually Literate Are Large Language Models? Reflections on Recent Advances and Future Directions

Large language models (LLMs) are now being applied to the tasks of visualization generation and understanding, demonstrating these models' ability to be "visually literate." On the generation side, LLMs have shown promise in powering natural languages' interfaces for visualization authoring while also suffering from usability and inconsistency issues. On the interpretation side, models (especially vision-language models) can answer basic questions about visualizations, synthesize visual and textual information, and detect misleading visual designs. However, models also tend to struggle with certain analytic tasks, and their takeaways from reading visualizations often differ from those of humans. We aim to both illuminate the state of the art in LLMs' visualization literacy and speculate on where such work may, and perhaps ought to, take us next.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2025.3605029
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Visually Literate Are Large Language Models? Reflections on Recent Advances and Future Directions

Alexander Bendeck, John Stasko
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

How Visually Literate Are Large Language Models? Reflections on Recent Advances and Future Directions

Alexander Bendeck, John Stasko
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are now being applied to the tasks of visualization generation and understanding, demonstrating these models' ability to be "visually literate." On the generation side, LLMs have shown promise in powering natural languages' interfaces for visualization authoring while also suffering from usability and inconsistency issues. On the interpretation side, models (especially vision-language models) can answer basic questions about visualizations, synthesize visual and textual information, and detect misleading visual designs. However, models also tend to struggle with certain analytic tasks, and their takeaways from reading visualizations often differ from those of humans. We aim to both illuminate the state of the art in LLMs' visualization literacy and speculate on where such work may, and perhaps ought to, take us next.

IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicationsVol. 45(6)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.