EFFECTS OF APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF LIQUID STARTER FERTILIZER ON MAIZE GROWTH AND YIELD

Liquid fertilizers have gained widespread use owing to their higher nutrient use efficiency, improved nutrient uptake, and reduced environmental impact. However, the agronomic effects of different application methods and rates of liquid fertilizer on maize growth and yield remain insufficiently investigated. This study conducted a two-year field experiment to evaluate the effects of four fertilizer application methods: band application of granular fertilizer (BAGF), mixed hole application of liquid fertilizer (MHALF), side hole application of liquid fertilizer (SHALF), and a control treatment without starter fertilizer (CK). Four liquid fertilizer rates (45, 105, 150, and 300 kg/ha) were tested. The results indicated that the application method plays a critical role in determining maize emergence and early growth. In particular, SHALF at moderate rates (45 and 105 kg/ha) significantly improved emergence rate, dry matter accumulation, and plant height compared with MHALF and BAGF. In contrast, high fertilizer rates (150 and 300 kg/ha) in MHALF treatments negatively affected emergence rate. Fertilizer treatments also had a significant effect on maize yield and its components. The SHALF treatment at a rate of 150 kg/ha resulted in an average yield increase of 4.9% compared with CK. These findings suggest that a moderate rate of SHALF is a practical and effective strategy for improving maize productivity in cold temperate regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INMATEH Agricultural Engineering
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-77-21
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF LIQUID STARTER FERTILIZER ON MAIZE GROWTH AND YIELD

Changchang Yu, Q.L. Wang, Qian Ding, Zhan He et al.
INMATEH Agricultural Engineering
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
article

EFFECTS OF APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF LIQUID STARTER FERTILIZER ON MAIZE GROWTH AND YIELD

Changchang Yu, Q.L. Wang, Qian Ding, Zhan He, X. Liu, He Li
article en

Abstract

Liquid fertilizers have gained widespread use owing to their higher nutrient use efficiency, improved nutrient uptake, and reduced environmental impact. However, the agronomic effects of different application methods and rates of liquid fertilizer on maize growth and yield remain insufficiently investigated. This study conducted a two-year field experiment to evaluate the effects of four fertilizer application methods: band application of granular fertilizer (BAGF), mixed hole application of liquid fertilizer (MHALF), side hole application of liquid fertilizer (SHALF), and a control treatment without starter fertilizer (CK). Four liquid fertilizer rates (45, 105, 150, and 300 kg/ha) were tested. The results indicated that the application method plays a critical role in determining maize emergence and early growth. In particular, SHALF at moderate rates (45 and 105 kg/ha) significantly improved emergence rate, dry matter accumulation, and plant height compared with MHALF and BAGF. In contrast, high fertilizer rates (150 and 300 kg/ha) in MHALF treatments negatively affected emergence rate. Fertilizer treatments also had a significant effect on maize yield and its components. The SHALF treatment at a rate of 150 kg/ha resulted in an average yield increase of 4.9% compared with CK. These findings suggest that a moderate rate of SHALF is a practical and effective strategy for improving maize productivity in cold temperate regions.

INMATEH Agricultural Engineering
Henan Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.