Eight-Year Cohort Study Examining Bicycling-Related Maxillofacial Fractures and Factors Contributing to Injury

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiological characteristics of bicycling-related maxillofacial fractures in a defined population and to identify factors contributing to these injuries. Methods: An 8-year cohort study was carried out, including all patients presenting with bicycling-related maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary care center from 2017 through 2024. Data recorded for each patient included age, gender, date and cause of injury, contributing factors, type of facial fractures, other injuries, hospital stay, and helmet use. Statistical analysis was performed. Continuous variables were assessed for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 899 cycling accident patients seeking medical treatment, 122 (13%) sustained facial fractures, accounting for 4% of all facial fracture cases in our department during the study period. In our cohort, the male–female ratio was 2.6:1, and the mean age was 29.5 years (SD 12.8, range 13–77). Collision with another object/vehicle was the most common cause (64%), followed by isolated falls (36%). A total of 135 facial fractures were recorded (some patients had multiple fractures). Mandibular fractures were most frequent (49% of patients), followed by zygomatic (32%), orbital (13%), nasal (7%), maxillary (2%) and frontal (2%) fractures. Among mandibular injuries, condylar fractures were the most common subtype (63%). Dental injuries were found in 27% of patients. The most common dental trauma was tooth fracture (43% of those with dental injuries), followed by tooth luxation (32%) and tooth avulsion (25%). In 80% of cases involving dental injuries, the upper anterior teeth were involved. Concomitant injuries were present in 20% of patients, most often orthopedic limb injuries. Only 27% of patients reported always wearing a helmet, whereas 43% reported never having worn one. Conclusions: Bicycling-related facial injuries are a noteworthy subset of facial trauma. Missed or delayed diagnosis can lead to lasting deformities and functional issues. Preventive strategies—especially promoting helmet use and improving helmet design—along with broader safety measures are important to reduce the incidence and severity of these injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osteology
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5040034
Primary Topic
Dental Trauma and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eight-Year Cohort Study Examining Bicycling-Related Maxillofacial Fractures and Factors Contributing to Injury

C. Alvarez-Delgado, Johan Wideberg, L.M. González-Pérez
Osteology
Dental Trauma and Treatments
article

Eight-Year Cohort Study Examining Bicycling-Related Maxillofacial Fractures and Factors Contributing to Injury

C. Alvarez-Delgado, Johan Wideberg, L.M. González-Pérez
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiological characteristics of bicycling-related maxillofacial fractures in a defined population and to identify factors contributing to these injuries. Methods: An 8-year cohort study was carried out, including all patients presenting with bicycling-related maxillofacial fractures at a tertiary care center from 2017 through 2024. Data recorded for each patient included age, gender, date and cause of injury, contributing factors, type of facial fractures, other injuries, hospital stay, and helmet use. Statistical analysis was performed. Continuous variables were assessed for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 899 cycling accident patients seeking medical treatment, 122 (13%) sustained facial fractures, accounting for 4% of all facial fracture cases in our department during the study period. In our cohort, the male–female ratio was 2.6:1, and the mean age was 29.5 years (SD 12.8, range 13–77). Collision with another object/vehicle was the most common cause (64%), followed by isolated falls (36%). A total of 135 facial fractures were recorded (some patients had multiple fractures). Mandibular fractures were most frequent (49% of patients), followed by zygomatic (32%), orbital (13%), nasal (7%), maxillary (2%) and frontal (2%) fractures. Among mandibular injuries, condylar fractures were the most common subtype (63%). Dental injuries were found in 27% of patients. The most common dental trauma was tooth fracture (43% of those with dental injuries), followed by tooth luxation (32%) and tooth avulsion (25%). In 80% of cases involving dental injuries, the upper anterior teeth were involved. Concomitant injuries were present in 20% of patients, most often orthopedic limb injuries. Only 27% of patients reported always wearing a helmet, whereas 43% reported never having worn one. Conclusions: Bicycling-related facial injuries are a noteworthy subset of facial trauma. Missed or delayed diagnosis can lead to lasting deformities and functional issues. Preventive strategies—especially promoting helmet use and improving helmet design—along with broader safety measures are important to reduce the incidence and severity of these injuries.

OsteologyVol. 5(4)
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Dental Trauma and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.