Transgressing the urban–rural divide alongside newly identifying Indigenous people in South Africa

Rural ways of life are frequently upheld as the pinnacle of Indigenous authenticity. It is often argued that urban-based and newly identifying Indigenous people model their authenticity after these ideals, or, conversely, that they pursue hybridity and Indigenous modernity instead of authenticity. Crucially, however, how and why Indigenous people themselves regard authenticity, rural, and urban as meaningful social constructions and expressions of agency is being overlooked. I propose a new conceptual approach based on ethnographic fieldwork among Khoisan (the Indigenous people of South Africa) revivalists in Cape Town, South Africa, between 2014 and 2022. As an assertion of self-representation, subversive authenticity thrives on intermittently rejecting, reinforcing, and ignoring dominant representations of Indigenous authenticity. This perspective provides new insights on the role of authenticity in processes of Indigenous resurgence and highlights the importance of theorising alongside Indigenous people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801251388177
Primary Topic
South African History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transgressing the urban–rural divide alongside newly identifying Indigenous people in South Africa

Rafaël Verbuyst
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
South African History and Culture
article

Transgressing the urban–rural divide alongside newly identifying Indigenous people in South Africa

Rafaël Verbuyst
article en

Abstract

Rural ways of life are frequently upheld as the pinnacle of Indigenous authenticity. It is often argued that urban-based and newly identifying Indigenous people model their authenticity after these ideals, or, conversely, that they pursue hybridity and Indigenous modernity instead of authenticity. Crucially, however, how and why Indigenous people themselves regard authenticity, rural, and urban as meaningful social constructions and expressions of agency is being overlooked. I propose a new conceptual approach based on ethnographic fieldwork among Khoisan (the Indigenous people of South Africa) revivalists in Cape Town, South Africa, between 2014 and 2022. As an assertion of self-representation, subversive authenticity thrives on intermittently rejecting, reinforcing, and ignoring dominant representations of Indigenous authenticity. This perspective provides new insights on the role of authenticity in processes of Indigenous resurgence and highlights the importance of theorising alongside Indigenous people.

AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous PeoplesVol. 22(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
South African History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.