Unresolved lattice Boltzmann method-discrete bubble method coupling for turbulent cavitating flow in injector nozzles

The Euler–Lagrange method is an effective approach for simulating multiphase bubble flows, as it provides detailed bubble information. Many previous studies have used the computational fluid dynamics–discrete bubble model (CFD-DBM) for this purpose. Traditional CFD-based solvers often face limitations in parallel scalability and computational efficiency, particularly when dealing with transient cavitation dynamics. To address these challenges, an advanced lattice Boltzmann method–discrete bubble method (LBM-DBM) approach is proposed in this study for simulating liquid–bubble multiphase flows. The standard lattice Boltzmann equation is extended with mass and momentum source terms to recover the volume-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for unresolved simulations and is coupled with the DBM to capture complex bubble behaviors, including nucleation, growth, breakup, and coalescence. The proposed model is validated on cavitating flows in a fuel injector nozzle, where predictions of velocity fields and cavitation cloud shedding are compared with available experimental observations. The simulated outlet velocity matches the experiments across different inlet pressures, with relative errors typically <0.1%. The validation results demonstrate that the LBM-DBM framework achieves high accuracy in reproducing key cavitation features. Furthermore, transient simulations inside the nozzle are performed to investigate cavitation periodicity (characteristic period T ≈ 0.283 ms), the spatial distribution of cavitation regions, bubble velocity distributions, and the dynamic processes of bubble coalescence and breakup. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed method as a reliable and efficient tool for studying complex cavitating flows in engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0302473
Primary Topic
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unresolved lattice Boltzmann method-discrete bubble method coupling for turbulent cavitating flow in injector nozzles

Zihan Liu, Zhixiong Wang, Du Zhou, Yongzhi Zhao et al.
Physics of Fluids
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
article

Unresolved lattice Boltzmann method-discrete bubble method coupling for turbulent cavitating flow in injector nozzles

Zihan Liu, Zhixiong Wang, Du Zhou, Yongzhi Zhao, John H. Zhang, Xiang Li, Chao Xu
article en

Abstract

The Euler–Lagrange method is an effective approach for simulating multiphase bubble flows, as it provides detailed bubble information. Many previous studies have used the computational fluid dynamics–discrete bubble model (CFD-DBM) for this purpose. Traditional CFD-based solvers often face limitations in parallel scalability and computational efficiency, particularly when dealing with transient cavitation dynamics. To address these challenges, an advanced lattice Boltzmann method–discrete bubble method (LBM-DBM) approach is proposed in this study for simulating liquid–bubble multiphase flows. The standard lattice Boltzmann equation is extended with mass and momentum source terms to recover the volume-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for unresolved simulations and is coupled with the DBM to capture complex bubble behaviors, including nucleation, growth, breakup, and coalescence. The proposed model is validated on cavitating flows in a fuel injector nozzle, where predictions of velocity fields and cavitation cloud shedding are compared with available experimental observations. The simulated outlet velocity matches the experiments across different inlet pressures, with relative errors typically <0.1%. The validation results demonstrate that the LBM-DBM framework achieves high accuracy in reproducing key cavitation features. Furthermore, transient simulations inside the nozzle are performed to investigate cavitation periodicity (characteristic period T ≈ 0.283 ms), the spatial distribution of cavitation regions, bubble velocity distributions, and the dynamic processes of bubble coalescence and breakup. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed method as a reliable and efficient tool for studying complex cavitating flows in engineering applications.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(11)
China General Nuclear Power Corporation (China) (CN), Zhejiang Institute of Special Equipment Inspection (CN), Hangzhou Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.