Measuring the care needs of young people with intellectual difficulties: Construct validity of the learning disability vulnerability assessment scale and utility in establish the care needs of young people

The concept of 'vulnerability' in children is critical to needs-related planning and risk management. Despite proliferation of measures there is limited evidence-base to support the validity of existing, relevant clinical assessments. The FACE CARAS young person's risk assessment toolkit includes a measure of vulnerability-the Learning Disability Vulnerability Assessment Scale (LD-VAS). Good inter-rater reliability has been reported but construct validity has not previously been demonstrated. The aims of this study were to assess the construct-validity of the tool by: (i) evaluating the dimensionality of the ratings produced, and (ii) modelling the ability of the scores to quantify the care needs of young people. LD-VAS ratings were available for 143 young people, the dimensionality of the scale ratings was assessed using a parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The ability of scores to predict care-level was modelled using discriminant function analysis and multinomial logistic regression. A single factor CFA model showed a good fit to the data. The discriminant function analysis suggested several scoring profiles exist, relating to care-level. On multinomial logistic regression the scores could statistically significantly differentiate between those in the lowest and higher intensity care categories. The LD-VAS appears to have construct validity and is potentially useful in supporting rational decision-making regarding care-provision for children affected by learning disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251392108
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the care needs of young people with intellectual difficulties: Construct validity of the learning disability vulnerability assessment scale and utility in establish the care needs of young people

Ursula O’Donnell, Stephen A. Evans, Gayle Cooney, Paul A. Tiffin et al.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
Family and Disability Support Research
article

Measuring the care needs of young people with intellectual difficulties: Construct validity of the learning disability vulnerability assessment scale and utility in establish the care needs of young people

Ursula O’Donnell, Stephen A. Evans, Gayle Cooney, Paul A. Tiffin, David Young
article en

Abstract

The concept of 'vulnerability' in children is critical to needs-related planning and risk management. Despite proliferation of measures there is limited evidence-base to support the validity of existing, relevant clinical assessments. The FACE CARAS young person's risk assessment toolkit includes a measure of vulnerability-the Learning Disability Vulnerability Assessment Scale (LD-VAS). Good inter-rater reliability has been reported but construct validity has not previously been demonstrated. The aims of this study were to assess the construct-validity of the tool by: (i) evaluating the dimensionality of the ratings produced, and (ii) modelling the ability of the scores to quantify the care needs of young people. LD-VAS ratings were available for 143 young people, the dimensionality of the scale ratings was assessed using a parallel analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The ability of scores to predict care-level was modelled using discriminant function analysis and multinomial logistic regression. A single factor CFA model showed a good fit to the data. The discriminant function analysis suggested several scoring profiles exist, relating to care-level. On multinomial logistic regression the scores could statistically significantly differentiate between those in the lowest and higher intensity care categories. The LD-VAS appears to have construct validity and is potentially useful in supporting rational decision-making regarding care-provision for children affected by learning disability.

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
University of Strathclyde (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), Scottish Government (GB), University of York (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.