Evaluating the Experiences of New and Existing Teledermatology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study

BACKGROUND: As teledermatology has been widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to examine patients' experiences and satisfaction with teledermatology. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the teledermatology experiences of new and existing clinic patients in the context of the rapid shift toward teledermatology practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 184 teledermatology patients who were assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic at a major southeastern medical center from May 13 to June 5, 2020. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction levels among new and existing patients. The secondary outcome was patients' willingness to use teledermatology in the future. RESULTS: Of the 288 teledermatology patients who were assessed during the study period, 184 (63.9%) completed the survey. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with teledermatology, with 86.4% (159/184) of participants reporting positive overall satisfaction and experiences with teledermatology. New patients had significantly higher Likert scores for overall satisfaction with teledermatology than those of follow-up patients (new patients: mean 4.70; existing patients: mean 4.43; <em>P</em>=.03). Overall, patients' satisfaction with teledermatology did not significantly differ based on age (<em>P</em>=.36), race and ethnicity (<em>P</em>=.46), education level (<em>P</em>=.11), residence (<em>P</em>=.74), or insurance status (<em>P</em>=.74). There were no significant differences in overall satisfaction between patients with and without prior telehealth experience (<em>P=</em>.53), between the video and telephone visit types (<em>P</em>=.17), and among platform types (<em>P=</em>.22). Prior telehealth experience was associated with higher odds of being willing to use telehealth in the future (odds ratio 2.39, 95% CI 1.31-4.35; <em>P</em>=.004). CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional survey study demonstrates that during the rapid expansion of teledermatology, new clinic patients had significantly higher scores for overall satisfaction with their teledermatology experience compared to those of established clinic patients (<em>P</em>=.03). Prior telehealth experience was associated with higher odds of being willing to use teledermatology in the future. Overall, teledermatology expansion was met with high levels of patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/tdp8-ay26
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Experiences of New and Existing Teledermatology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Saif Khairat, Alison Nancy Hollis, Amy Fox, Judy Hamad et al.
UNC Libraries
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Evaluating the Experiences of New and Existing Teledermatology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study

Saif Khairat, Alison Nancy Hollis, Amy Fox, Judy Hamad, Maria S. Kammire
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As teledermatology has been widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to examine patients' experiences and satisfaction with teledermatology. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the teledermatology experiences of new and existing clinic patients in the context of the rapid shift toward teledermatology practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 184 teledermatology patients who were assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic at a major southeastern medical center from May 13 to June 5, 2020. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction levels among new and existing patients. The secondary outcome was patients' willingness to use teledermatology in the future. RESULTS: Of the 288 teledermatology patients who were assessed during the study period, 184 (63.9%) completed the survey. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with teledermatology, with 86.4% (159/184) of participants reporting positive overall satisfaction and experiences with teledermatology. New patients had significantly higher Likert scores for overall satisfaction with teledermatology than those of follow-up patients (new patients: mean 4.70; existing patients: mean 4.43; <em>P</em>=.03). Overall, patients' satisfaction with teledermatology did not significantly differ based on age (<em>P</em>=.36), race and ethnicity (<em>P</em>=.46), education level (<em>P</em>=.11), residence (<em>P</em>=.74), or insurance status (<em>P</em>=.74). There were no significant differences in overall satisfaction between patients with and without prior telehealth experience (<em>P=</em>.53), between the video and telephone visit types (<em>P</em>=.17), and among platform types (<em>P=</em>.22). Prior telehealth experience was associated with higher odds of being willing to use telehealth in the future (odds ratio 2.39, 95% CI 1.31-4.35; <em>P</em>=.004). CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional survey study demonstrates that during the rapid expansion of teledermatology, new clinic patients had significantly higher scores for overall satisfaction with their teledermatology experience compared to those of established clinic patients (<em>P</em>=.03). Prior telehealth experience was associated with higher odds of being willing to use teledermatology in the future. Overall, teledermatology expansion was met with high levels of patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.