A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Mahoning County, Ohio’s Mandatory Reporters of Adult Protective Services

Adult protective services (APS) are an emerging key component of the aging network. The current research examines Mahoning County, Ohio's system using snowball sampling of mandatory reporters working in the county (<i>n</i> = 240). Descriptive data and thematic analyses of responses revealed five primary themes: education, reporting process, follow-through, communication, and relationships. Demographic information collected about the participants included gender, age, years of experience, highest level of education, and current profession. Participants reported confidence in their knowledge of elder abuse and neglect. A majority of participants had reported suspected elder abuse to APS (51.2%). Recommendations include increased staffing, increased education of the role of APS and the rest of the Aging Network, and improved communication-within ethical guidelines-of outcomes from reports of suspected elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation. At this time, the Mahoning County's APS does not meet the new standards set forth by the Administration for Community Living guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251397711
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Mahoning County, Ohio’s Mandatory Reporters of Adult Protective Services

Daniel J. Van Dussen, Rachel E. Ward
Journal of Applied Gerontology
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Mahoning County, Ohio’s Mandatory Reporters of Adult Protective Services

Daniel J. Van Dussen, Rachel E. Ward
article en

Abstract

Adult protective services (APS) are an emerging key component of the aging network. The current research examines Mahoning County, Ohio's system using snowball sampling of mandatory reporters working in the county (<i>n</i> = 240). Descriptive data and thematic analyses of responses revealed five primary themes: education, reporting process, follow-through, communication, and relationships. Demographic information collected about the participants included gender, age, years of experience, highest level of education, and current profession. Participants reported confidence in their knowledge of elder abuse and neglect. A majority of participants had reported suspected elder abuse to APS (51.2%). Recommendations include increased staffing, increased education of the role of APS and the rest of the Aging Network, and improved communication-within ethical guidelines-of outcomes from reports of suspected elder abuse, neglect, or exploitation. At this time, the Mahoning County's APS does not meet the new standards set forth by the Administration for Community Living guidelines.

Journal of Applied Gerontology
Youngstown State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.