Disparities in cancer survival by socioeconomic status: findings from a population-based study of 942 241 Australians from 1980 to 2019

Cancer survival in Australia has improved over time, but disparities by socioeconomic status (SES) persist. We analyzed data from the population-wide New South Wales Cancer Registry, including 942,241 individuals with invasive solid cancers diagnosed 1980-2019. We examined cancer-specific and all-cause deaths by area-based SES for all solid cancers and 12 common cancers, using competing risks regression alongside crude survival. Five-year cancer-specific survival for all cancers improved from 50.3% in 1980-89 to 73.3% in 2010-19. Risk of cancer death was higher for individuals living in most socio-economically disadvantaged areas (versus least disadvantaged areas), and differences increased over time: from sub-hazard ratio 1.04 (95%CI : 1.02-1.07) in 1980-89, to 1.35 (95%CI : 1.32-1.38) in 2010-19 (adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, cancer spread). Statistically significant and increasing differences were observed for prostate, breast, melanoma, colorectal, lung, bladder and stomach cancers. Disparities in cancer survival have continued to widen, requiring improved understanding and targeted interventions to address inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf305
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in cancer survival by socioeconomic status: findings from a population-based study of 942 241 Australians from 1980 to 2019

Melissa A. Merritt, Xue Qin Yu, Sarsha Yap, Karen Canfell et al.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Disparities in cancer survival by socioeconomic status: findings from a population-based study of 942 241 Australians from 1980 to 2019

Melissa A. Merritt, Xue Qin Yu, Sarsha Yap, Karen Canfell, Preston Ngo, David Goldsbury, Qingwei Luo, Yoon‐Jung Kang, Benjamin D.T. Gallagher, Marianne Frances Weber, Jeff Cuff, Julia Steinberg, Eleonora Feletto, David Smith
article en

Abstract

Cancer survival in Australia has improved over time, but disparities by socioeconomic status (SES) persist. We analyzed data from the population-wide New South Wales Cancer Registry, including 942,241 individuals with invasive solid cancers diagnosed 1980-2019. We examined cancer-specific and all-cause deaths by area-based SES for all solid cancers and 12 common cancers, using competing risks regression alongside crude survival. Five-year cancer-specific survival for all cancers improved from 50.3% in 1980-89 to 73.3% in 2010-19. Risk of cancer death was higher for individuals living in most socio-economically disadvantaged areas (versus least disadvantaged areas), and differences increased over time: from sub-hazard ratio 1.04 (95%CI : 1.02-1.07) in 1980-89, to 1.35 (95%CI : 1.32-1.38) in 2010-19 (adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, cancer spread). Statistically significant and increasing differences were observed for prostate, breast, melanoma, colorectal, lung, bladder and stomach cancers. Disparities in cancer survival have continued to widen, requiring improved understanding and targeted interventions to address inequities.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
World Health Organization, Cancer Institute NSW, NSW Ministry of Health, National Coronial Information System, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.