Performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative – Update 2025

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following six key performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for monitoring and evaluation in daily practice at center and endoscopist level: (1: ) informed patient consent (100 % of procedures); (2: ) adequate documentation of landmarks (≥ 90 % of procedures); (3: ) structured training and supervision for trainees, preferably using assessment tools (≥ 20 %); (4: ) standardized description of pancreatic cystic lesions (≥ 85 %); (5: ) diagnostic tissue acquisition with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine-needle biopsy for solid lesions (≥ 85 %); (6: ) adverse events (< 5 % in cystic and < 3 % in solid lesions). A recommendation to administer antibiotics for EUS-guided puncture of cystic lesions, included in the previous ESGE quality improvement document, has been omitted in the current version based on recent evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2716-7763
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative – Update 2025

Marcus Hollenbach, Antonio Facciorusso, Jan‐Werner Poley, Monika Ferlitsch et al.
1 citations
Endoscopy
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.05
article

Performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative – Update 2025

Marcus Hollenbach, Antonio Facciorusso, Jan‐Werner Poley, Monika Ferlitsch, Andrea A. Anderloni, Wafaa Ahmed, Ilaria Tarantino, Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Andrada Seicean, Dirk Domagk, John Gásdal Karstensen, Suzane Ribeiro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommends that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following six key performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for monitoring and evaluation in daily practice at center and endoscopist level: (1: ) informed patient consent (100 % of procedures); (2: ) adequate documentation of landmarks (≥ 90 % of procedures); (3: ) structured training and supervision for trainees, preferably using assessment tools (≥ 20 %); (4: ) standardized description of pancreatic cystic lesions (≥ 85 %); (5: ) diagnostic tissue acquisition with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine-needle biopsy for solid lesions (≥ 85 %); (6: ) adverse events (< 5 % in cystic and < 3 % in solid lesions). A recommendation to administer antibiotics for EUS-guided puncture of cystic lesions, included in the previous ESGE quality improvement document, has been omitted in the current version based on recent evidence.

EndoscopyVol. 58(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Salento (IT), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), University of Pavia (IT), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), Amager Hospital (DK), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Österreichischer Rundfunk (AT), Hammersmith Hospital (GB), Maastricht University (NL), University Hospital Münster (DE), University Hospital of Heraklion (GR), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.