What’s Next for Feedback in Writing Instruction? Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment Practices and the Role of Generative AI

Providing effective feedback on writing remains a challenge for teachers. Among the tools and strategies being explored to address this issue is generative artificial intelligence (AI), due to its potential to deliver immediate and tailored feedback that complements teacher input. However, successful implementation requires understanding the views of those likely to integrate such tools into their future teaching practice. This quasi-experimental study explores pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the inclusion of generative AI-generated feedback. A control group received teacher feedback on their writing, while an experimental group received a combination of teacher and AI-generated feedback. After the intervention, participants’ views on the feedback received and their preparedness for assessing writing were analyzed. Results reveal more positive perceptions among the experimental group, along with greater confidence in their ability to teach and assess writing. Although both groups acknowledged the need to improve their own linguistic knowledge and assessment strategies, and emphasized the importance of teacher-led feedback, participants in the experimental group also advocated for including AI tools. This highlights the need to strengthen linguistic knowledge and assessment training in teacher education, as well as the positive attitudes and openness towards generative AI among those who have experienced its potential in feedback provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111534
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s Next for Feedback in Writing Instruction? Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment Practices and the Role of Generative AI

Jesús Guzmán Mora, Almudena García González, Maria Navío-Inglés, Paula O’Connor-Jiménez
2 citations
Education Sciences
Student Assessment and Feedback
17.85
article

What’s Next for Feedback in Writing Instruction? Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment Practices and the Role of Generative AI

Jesús Guzmán Mora, Almudena García González, Maria Navío-Inglés, Paula O’Connor-Jiménez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Providing effective feedback on writing remains a challenge for teachers. Among the tools and strategies being explored to address this issue is generative artificial intelligence (AI), due to its potential to deliver immediate and tailored feedback that complements teacher input. However, successful implementation requires understanding the views of those likely to integrate such tools into their future teaching practice. This quasi-experimental study explores pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the inclusion of generative AI-generated feedback. A control group received teacher feedback on their writing, while an experimental group received a combination of teacher and AI-generated feedback. After the intervention, participants’ views on the feedback received and their preparedness for assessing writing were analyzed. Results reveal more positive perceptions among the experimental group, along with greater confidence in their ability to teach and assess writing. Although both groups acknowledged the need to improve their own linguistic knowledge and assessment strategies, and emphasized the importance of teacher-led feedback, participants in the experimental group also advocated for including AI tools. This highlights the need to strengthen linguistic knowledge and assessment training in teacher education, as well as the positive attitudes and openness towards generative AI among those who have experienced its potential in feedback provision.

Education SciencesVol. 15(11)
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real (ES), Instituto Tecnico Agronómico Provincial (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Student Assessment and Feedback
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.