Complex Intervention Programs Integrating Multiple Intervention Strategies Were Not More Effective than Active Control Groups: Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials

<b>Background:</b> Evidence-based complex psychological interventions have been widely applied and appear promising in improving emotional and behavioral disturbances such as depression and sleep problems. However, the effectiveness of these complex psychological interventions, particularly in comparison to active control groups, has yet to be confirmed. <b>Objectives:</b> To explore the effects of a complex set of intervention strategies on depression and sleep quality, two randomized controlled trials with active control conditions were conducted. <b>Method:</b> A total of 97 college students with depressive symptoms were enrolled in study 1 (Intervention = 48; Active control = 49) and participated in the intervention for depression. A total of 110 college students with sleep problems (intervention = 54; active control = 56) participated in the intervention for sleep quality in study 2. College students in the intervention group received a combination intervention program of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness exercises, and positive psychology for depression or sleep quality, while participants in the active control group read popular science articles about mental health. The intervention lasted two weeks. Depression, sleep quality, and related factors were measured before, during, and after the interventions. <b>Results:</b> Although both the intervention and active control conditions effectively reduced depression and sleep problems, the trend of change over time was consistent between both groups. Overall, the effects of the intervention group were not better than those of the active control group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The effects of short-term, multi-strategy interventions on depression and sleep quality in our study were not better than simply reading articles about mental health. These findings suggest that simply combining evidence-based components does not necessarily produce superior outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111554
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complex Intervention Programs Integrating Multiple Intervention Strategies Were Not More Effective than Active Control Groups: Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials

Chunyang Zhang, Wei Xu, Tianyuan Liu, Jung Wei Huang et al.
Behavioral Sciences
Sleep and related disorders
article

Complex Intervention Programs Integrating Multiple Intervention Strategies Were Not More Effective than Active Control Groups: Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials

Chunyang Zhang, Wei Xu, Tianyuan Liu, Jung Wei Huang, Shoushi Wang
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Evidence-based complex psychological interventions have been widely applied and appear promising in improving emotional and behavioral disturbances such as depression and sleep problems. However, the effectiveness of these complex psychological interventions, particularly in comparison to active control groups, has yet to be confirmed. <b>Objectives:</b> To explore the effects of a complex set of intervention strategies on depression and sleep quality, two randomized controlled trials with active control conditions were conducted. <b>Method:</b> A total of 97 college students with depressive symptoms were enrolled in study 1 (Intervention = 48; Active control = 49) and participated in the intervention for depression. A total of 110 college students with sleep problems (intervention = 54; active control = 56) participated in the intervention for sleep quality in study 2. College students in the intervention group received a combination intervention program of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness exercises, and positive psychology for depression or sleep quality, while participants in the active control group read popular science articles about mental health. The intervention lasted two weeks. Depression, sleep quality, and related factors were measured before, during, and after the interventions. <b>Results:</b> Although both the intervention and active control conditions effectively reduced depression and sleep problems, the trend of change over time was consistent between both groups. Overall, the effects of the intervention group were not better than those of the active control group. <b>Conclusions:</b> The effects of short-term, multi-strategy interventions on depression and sleep quality in our study were not better than simply reading articles about mental health. These findings suggest that simply combining evidence-based components does not necessarily produce superior outcomes.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(11)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Chinese Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.