The many facets of fairness in recommender systems: Consumers, providers and items

Autonomous decision-making systems, particularly recommender systems, have received increasing attention concerning fairness, i.e., if all stakeholders affected by such a system are treated equally as a result of the recommendations. Existing approaches primarily focus on fairness between two stakeholders – consumers and providers or consumers and items – treating providers and items as the same entity. However, we argue for the treatment of providers and items as distinct stakeholders to offer more comprehensive models of fairness in recommender systems. To this end, we propose a fairness-aware recommender system, CIPFRS, designed to optimize fairness across all three key stakeholders: consumers, providers, and items. We examine consumer fairness regarding their level of interaction with the system; high and low-activity users should be treated equally. Further, all providers should have an equal opportunity for their products to be recommended. Finally, we propose an approach to implement item fairness in each provider’s inventory. We report an extensive evaluation of the proposed solution through three datasets, demonstrating that considering all three stakeholders yields improved recommendations while minimizing bias.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2025.102643
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The many facets of fairness in recommender systems: Consumers, providers and items

Reza Shafiloo, Thomas Olsson, Kostas Stefanidis, Maria Stratigi et al.
2 citations
Information Systems
Recommender Systems and Techniques
6.49
article

The many facets of fairness in recommender systems: Consumers, providers and items

Reza Shafiloo, Thomas Olsson, Kostas Stefanidis, Maria Stratigi, Jaakko Peltonen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Autonomous decision-making systems, particularly recommender systems, have received increasing attention concerning fairness, i.e., if all stakeholders affected by such a system are treated equally as a result of the recommendations. Existing approaches primarily focus on fairness between two stakeholders – consumers and providers or consumers and items – treating providers and items as the same entity. However, we argue for the treatment of providers and items as distinct stakeholders to offer more comprehensive models of fairness in recommender systems. To this end, we propose a fairness-aware recommender system, CIPFRS, designed to optimize fairness across all three key stakeholders: consumers, providers, and items. We examine consumer fairness regarding their level of interaction with the system; high and low-activity users should be treated equally. Further, all providers should have an equal opportunity for their products to be recommended. Finally, we propose an approach to implement item fairness in each provider’s inventory. We report an extensive evaluation of the proposed solution through three datasets, demonstrating that considering all three stakeholders yields improved recommendations while minimizing bias.

Information SystemsVol. 137
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The many facets of fairness in recommender systems: Consumers, providers and items — Reza Shafiloo, Thomas Olsson, et al. · Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS