On the Literary Relations between Iakinf (Bichurin) and M. P. Pogodin

Subject of the research — the literary relations between Iakinf (Bichurin), the founder of Russian Sinology, and M. P. Pogodin, a writer, historian, and editor of the journals Moskovskii vestnik and Moskvityanin. The main sources are the correspondence between the two scholar-writers and Iakinf’s publications in the journals edited by Pogodin. The study analyzes how Iakinf’s journalistic activity influenced his development as a writer engaged in the popularization of knowledge about China, Mongolia, and Central Asia, and how, in turn, he contributed to shaping the literary and scholarly discourse in Pogodin’s journals. Special attention is given to Iakinf’s participation in the discussion of issues related to Old Russian history on the pages of Moskvityanin. The work refines the understanding of the interaction between the two authors and identifies Iakinf’s role in the formation of the intellectual environment of early nineteenth-century Russia. The research employs traditional literary methods, including the cultural-historical approach, as well as source-critical and textological analysis. The novelty of the study lies in its results, which make it possible to trace the dynamics and mechanisms of the literary relationship between Iakinf and Pogodin and to clarify the nature of their interaction both in science and in literature — in the process of preparing materials for literary journals. The conducted research allows us to conclude that Iakinf’s literary and journalistic activities and his collaboration with Pogodin were of paramount importance for the popularization of knowledge about China in Russia during the first half of the nineteenth century: it was precisely the literary milieu that became the space for the institutionalization of this knowledge and its integration into the system of Russian literary culture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Litera
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2025.11.76747
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Literary Relations between Iakinf (Bichurin) and M. P. Pogodin

Chengbian Cheng
Litera
Soviet and Russian History
article

On the Literary Relations between Iakinf (Bichurin) and M. P. Pogodin

Chengbian Cheng
article en

Abstract

Subject of the research — the literary relations between Iakinf (Bichurin), the founder of Russian Sinology, and M. P. Pogodin, a writer, historian, and editor of the journals Moskovskii vestnik and Moskvityanin. The main sources are the correspondence between the two scholar-writers and Iakinf’s publications in the journals edited by Pogodin. The study analyzes how Iakinf’s journalistic activity influenced his development as a writer engaged in the popularization of knowledge about China, Mongolia, and Central Asia, and how, in turn, he contributed to shaping the literary and scholarly discourse in Pogodin’s journals. Special attention is given to Iakinf’s participation in the discussion of issues related to Old Russian history on the pages of Moskvityanin. The work refines the understanding of the interaction between the two authors and identifies Iakinf’s role in the formation of the intellectual environment of early nineteenth-century Russia. The research employs traditional literary methods, including the cultural-historical approach, as well as source-critical and textological analysis. The novelty of the study lies in its results, which make it possible to trace the dynamics and mechanisms of the literary relationship between Iakinf and Pogodin and to clarify the nature of their interaction both in science and in literature — in the process of preparing materials for literary journals. The conducted research allows us to conclude that Iakinf’s literary and journalistic activities and his collaboration with Pogodin were of paramount importance for the popularization of knowledge about China in Russia during the first half of the nineteenth century: it was precisely the literary milieu that became the space for the institutionalization of this knowledge and its integration into the system of Russian literary culture.

Litera(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.