Evaluation of the Duration of Good Visual Acuity During Anti-VEGF Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Routine Clinical Practice

The aim of this study was to analyse data from a clinical database using a novel visual acuity parameter to determine whether anti-VEGF molecules that target multiple domains involved in neovascularisation are more likely to achieve good visual acuity than agents that solely inhibit VEGF. This retrospective study analysed data from patients treated with anti-VEGF injections between 2015 and 2023. We set an ETDRS score threshold of 70 (equivalent to 20/40 Snellen acuity) to calculate 'time in range' (TIR). TIR is defined as 'time spent with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/40' and can highlight significant variations in the time individuals spend above the threshold during their AMD treatment. Over nine years, 30,209 aflibercept and 10,876 ranibizumab injections were administered to 6043 patients. Patients received an average of 6.8 injections. The mean BCVA at the first injection was 57.00 ± 16.15 ETDRS letters for ranibizumab patients and 58.75 ± 15.82 for aflibercept patients, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Both groups showed significant improvement in visual acuity at follow-up (aflibercept: 60.21 ± 15.53; ranibizumab: 59.43 ± 15.81; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean time between the two consecutive injections, including both the initial loading phase and the subsequent maintenance phase, was 67.22 ± 34.08 days for ranibizumab and 72.15 ± 31.00 days for aflibercept; the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After controlling for the effect of initial BCVA and time between injections, patients who received aflibercept had a significantly higher average TIR (60.90 ± 36.27 days vs. 56.55 ± 38.78 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and significantly more likely to achieve >70 letters at the next visit (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to patients receiving ranibizumab. Aflibercept treatment improves the likelihood of maintaining good BCVA by 10% compared to ranibizumab in patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of aflibercept treatment are observed with less frequent dosing. Our results suggest that using anti-VEGF compounds that target multiple domains provides a detectable advantage in treating age-related macular degeneration, particularly when these agents have a longer duration of action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210927
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Duration of Good Visual Acuity During Anti-VEGF Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Routine Clinical Practice

Zsuzsanna Szepessy, Ágnes Borbándy, Gábor László Sándor, Lilla István et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
1.71
article

Evaluation of the Duration of Good Visual Acuity During Anti-VEGF Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Routine Clinical Practice

Zsuzsanna Szepessy, Ágnes Borbándy, Gábor László Sándor, Lilla István, Illés Kovács, Andrea Gyenes, Miklós Resch, András Papp, Mónika Ecsedy, Zoltán Z. Nagy, György Barcsay, Antal Szabó, Balázs Lesch, Zsuzsa Récsán
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse data from a clinical database using a novel visual acuity parameter to determine whether anti-VEGF molecules that target multiple domains involved in neovascularisation are more likely to achieve good visual acuity than agents that solely inhibit VEGF. This retrospective study analysed data from patients treated with anti-VEGF injections between 2015 and 2023. We set an ETDRS score threshold of 70 (equivalent to 20/40 Snellen acuity) to calculate 'time in range' (TIR). TIR is defined as 'time spent with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than 20/40' and can highlight significant variations in the time individuals spend above the threshold during their AMD treatment. Over nine years, 30,209 aflibercept and 10,876 ranibizumab injections were administered to 6043 patients. Patients received an average of 6.8 injections. The mean BCVA at the first injection was 57.00 ± 16.15 ETDRS letters for ranibizumab patients and 58.75 ± 15.82 for aflibercept patients, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Both groups showed significant improvement in visual acuity at follow-up (aflibercept: 60.21 ± 15.53; ranibizumab: 59.43 ± 15.81; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean time between the two consecutive injections, including both the initial loading phase and the subsequent maintenance phase, was 67.22 ± 34.08 days for ranibizumab and 72.15 ± 31.00 days for aflibercept; the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After controlling for the effect of initial BCVA and time between injections, patients who received aflibercept had a significantly higher average TIR (60.90 ± 36.27 days vs. 56.55 ± 38.78 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and significantly more likely to achieve >70 letters at the next visit (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to patients receiving ranibizumab. Aflibercept treatment improves the likelihood of maintaining good BCVA by 10% compared to ranibizumab in patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of aflibercept treatment are observed with less frequent dosing. Our results suggest that using anti-VEGF compounds that target multiple domains provides a detectable advantage in treating age-related macular degeneration, particularly when these agents have a longer duration of action.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(22)
Semmelweis University (HU), Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.