The rise of sustainable finance in China: ESG funds and regulation

Abstract This article examines the emerging ecosystem of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) funds in China, focusing on their classification, regulation, and policy context. It presents a taxonomy of ESG funds in the Chinese market, including public, private, government-guided, and Public–Private Partnership (PPP) funds. It analyses China’s distinctive policy-driven transformation model on ESG, emphasizing its top-down design and the pivotal role of State-owned Enterprises (SOEs), and the use of phased policy implementation. Compared to the European Union’s sophisticated disclosure and taxonomy regime, China requires clearer legal definitions, mandatory reporting mechanisms, and a unified classification system on ESG funds. The crucial future task involves balancing government intervention with market forces to ensure capital is channelled into the real economy’s green transformation. This will be essential for establishing an internationally competitive sustainable finance framework and ensuring capital genuinely supports industrial upgrading and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Capital Markets Law Journal
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaf015
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The rise of sustainable finance in China: ESG funds and regulation

Lin Lin
4 citations
Capital Markets Law Journal
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
8.83
article

The rise of sustainable finance in China: ESG funds and regulation

Lin Lin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the emerging ecosystem of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) funds in China, focusing on their classification, regulation, and policy context. It presents a taxonomy of ESG funds in the Chinese market, including public, private, government-guided, and Public–Private Partnership (PPP) funds. It analyses China’s distinctive policy-driven transformation model on ESG, emphasizing its top-down design and the pivotal role of State-owned Enterprises (SOEs), and the use of phased policy implementation. Compared to the European Union’s sophisticated disclosure and taxonomy regime, China requires clearer legal definitions, mandatory reporting mechanisms, and a unified classification system on ESG funds. The crucial future task involves balancing government intervention with market forces to ensure capital is channelled into the real economy’s green transformation. This will be essential for establishing an internationally competitive sustainable finance framework and ensuring capital genuinely supports industrial upgrading and sustainable development.

Capital Markets Law JournalVol. 20(4)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
8.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.