Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms

Clibration of constitutive models is a critical step in geotechnical design, ensuring that numerical predictions accurately reproduce observed behavior. This study explores the use of Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for the calibration of Biot’s poroelastic model based on oedometer test data. A two-stage calibration procedure was applied. In Stage 1, when five parameters were varied simultaneously, the results showed strong parameter intercorrelation and structural non-identifiability, as different parameter sets produced nearly identical objective function values. To address this limitation, an identifiability analysis was performed, leading to parameter reduction. In Stage 2, only A, R, and k were calibrated, with N and H fixed, which resulted in stable and interpretable solutions. The GA-based approach demonstrated convergence, the absence of local minima, and good agreement with experimental data. The study highlights both the potential and the current limitations of GA-based calibration and should be regarded as a proof-of-concept rather than a complete identifiability study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211972
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms

I. Bagińska, Monika Bartlewska-Urban
Applied Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms

I. Bagińska, Monika Bartlewska-Urban
article en

Abstract

Clibration of constitutive models is a critical step in geotechnical design, ensuring that numerical predictions accurately reproduce observed behavior. This study explores the use of Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for the calibration of Biot’s poroelastic model based on oedometer test data. A two-stage calibration procedure was applied. In Stage 1, when five parameters were varied simultaneously, the results showed strong parameter intercorrelation and structural non-identifiability, as different parameter sets produced nearly identical objective function values. To address this limitation, an identifiability analysis was performed, leading to parameter reduction. In Stage 2, only A, R, and k were calibrated, with N and H fixed, which resulted in stable and interpretable solutions. The GA-based approach demonstrated convergence, the absence of local minima, and good agreement with experimental data. The study highlights both the potential and the current limitations of GA-based calibration and should be regarded as a proof-of-concept rather than a complete identifiability study.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(22)
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms — I. Bagińska, Monika Bartlewska-Urban · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS