Revising the Giant Planet Mass–Metallicity Relation: Deciphering the Formation Sequence of Giant Planets

Abstract The rate at which giant planets accumulate solids and gas is a critical component of planet formation models, yet it is extremely challenging to predict from first principles. Characterizing the heavy element (everything other than hydrogen and helium) content of giant planets provides important clues about their provenance. Using thermal evolution models with an updated H–He equation of state and atmospheric boundary conditions that vary with envelope metallicity, we quantify the bulk heavy element content of 147 warm (&lt;1000 K) giant planets with well-measured masses and radii, more than tripling the sample size studied in D. P. Thorngren et al. These measurements reveal that the population’s heavy element mass follows the relation <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>core</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>core</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> M ⊕ , f Z = 0.09 ± 0.01, and an astrophysical scatter of 0.66 ± 0.08 × M Z . The classical core-accretion scenario ( Z p = 1 at 10 M ⊕ and Z p = 0.5 at 20 M ⊕ ) is inconsistent with the population. At low planet masses (≪150 M ⊕ ), <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and as a result, Z p = M Z / M p declines linearly with M p . However, bulk metallicity does not continue to decline with planet mass and instead flattens out at f Z ∼ 0.09 (∼7 × solar metallicity). When normalized by stellar metallicity, Z p / Z ⋆ flattens out at 3.3 ± 0.5 at high planet masses. This explicitly shows that giant planets continue to accrete material enriched in heavy elements during the gas accretion phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae0cbf
Citations
8
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revising the Giant Planet Mass–Metallicity Relation: Deciphering the Formation Sequence of Giant Planets

Jonathan J. Fortney, Kazumasa Ohno, Daniel Thorngren, Ruth Murray‐Clay et al.
8 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
High-pressure geophysics and materials
14.93
article

Revising the Giant Planet Mass–Metallicity Relation: Deciphering the Formation Sequence of Giant Planets

Jonathan J. Fortney, Kazumasa Ohno, Daniel Thorngren, Ruth Murray‐Clay, Yayaati Chachan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rate at which giant planets accumulate solids and gas is a critical component of planet formation models, yet it is extremely challenging to predict from first principles. Characterizing the heavy element (everything other than hydrogen and helium) content of giant planets provides important clues about their provenance. Using thermal evolution models with an updated H–He equation of state and atmospheric boundary conditions that vary with envelope metallicity, we quantify the bulk heavy element content of 147 warm (&lt;1000 K) giant planets with well-measured masses and radii, more than tripling the sample size studied in D. P. Thorngren et al. These measurements reveal that the population’s heavy element mass follows the relation <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>core</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>core</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> , with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> <mml:mo>.</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.8</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> M ⊕ , f Z = 0.09 ± 0.01, and an astrophysical scatter of 0.66 ± 0.08 × M Z . The classical core-accretion scenario ( Z p = 1 at 10 M ⊕ and Z p = 0.5 at 20 M ⊕ ) is inconsistent with the population. At low planet masses (≪150 M ⊕ ), <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">core</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and as a result, Z p = M Z / M p declines linearly with M p . However, bulk metallicity does not continue to decline with planet mass and instead flattens out at f Z ∼ 0.09 (∼7 × solar metallicity). When normalized by stellar metallicity, Z p / Z ⋆ flattens out at 3.3 ± 0.5 at high planet masses. This explicitly shows that giant planets continue to accrete material enriched in heavy elements during the gas accretion phase.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 994(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (JP)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
14.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.