Recovery revisited: a critical reflection on the suitability of recovery frameworks for child and youth mental health services

The recovery concept has been widely integrated into mental health policy, services, and research. However, its applicability across diverse contexts and populations remains a subject of ongoing critique. This paper discusses key issues pertaining to the suitability of implementing the recovery approach in child and youth mental health services, including adult-centric foundations of the recovery concept; limited multi-stakeholder participatory research; privileging individualistic ideologies; differences in developmental stages; differences in illness trajectory, mental health experiences, and service provider interactions; and different systems of care and social environments. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2025.10121
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery revisited: a critical reflection on the suitability of recovery frameworks for child and youth mental health services

Shalini Lal
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Recovery revisited: a critical reflection on the suitability of recovery frameworks for child and youth mental health services

Shalini Lal
article en

Abstract

The recovery concept has been widely integrated into mental health policy, services, and research. However, its applicability across diverse contexts and populations remains a subject of ongoing critique. This paper discusses key issues pertaining to the suitability of implementing the recovery approach in child and youth mental health services, including adult-centric foundations of the recovery concept; limited multi-stakeholder participatory research; privileging individualistic ideologies; differences in developmental stages; differences in illness trajectory, mental health experiences, and service provider interactions; and different systems of care and social environments. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research.

Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
The University of Sydney (AU), Douglas College (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.