Impact of non-normal flow rule on linear kinematic features in pan-Arctic ice-ocean simulations

Abstract. The standard sea ice viscous-plastic (VP) rheology is based on an elliptical yield curve and a normal flow rule. This formulation implies that the post-failure deformations are always normal to the yield curve. A drawback of this is that modifications to the yield curve also lead to notable changes to the deformations. We implemented the plastic potential approach of Ringeisen et al. (2021) in the CICE sea ice model. With this formulation, deformations are normal to an elliptical plastic potential which is defined independently from the yield curve. This an interesting capability as it allows to independently optimize deformations while parameters defining the yield curve could serve to adjust landfast ice and to a lesser extent sea ice drift. We investigated the impact of a non-normal flow rule in pan-Arctic simulations. Compared to the standard VP rheology, the non-normal flow rule leads to a more active sea ice cover with narrower linear kinematic features (LKFs) and a higher LKF density. The higher divergence with the non-normal flow rule causes an enhanced ice growth and larger Arctic sea ice volume. In idealized experiments, Ringeisen et al. (2021) showed that the non-normal flow rule can correct the unrealistic (too large) intersection angles between LKFs. However, in our pan-Arctic simulations, the non-normal flow rule does not correct the unrealistic intersection angles which are often around 90°. Results suggest that these frequent 90° angles are partly caused by the alignment of LKFs with the computational grid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5639-2025
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of non-normal flow rule on linear kinematic features in pan-Arctic ice-ocean simulations

Bruno Tremblay, Nils Hutter, Philippe Blain, Jean‐François Lemieux et al.
˜The œcryosphere
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Impact of non-normal flow rule on linear kinematic features in pan-Arctic ice-ocean simulations

Bruno Tremblay, Nils Hutter, Philippe Blain, Jean‐François Lemieux, Damien Ringeisen, Mathieu Plante, François Roy
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The standard sea ice viscous-plastic (VP) rheology is based on an elliptical yield curve and a normal flow rule. This formulation implies that the post-failure deformations are always normal to the yield curve. A drawback of this is that modifications to the yield curve also lead to notable changes to the deformations. We implemented the plastic potential approach of Ringeisen et al. (2021) in the CICE sea ice model. With this formulation, deformations are normal to an elliptical plastic potential which is defined independently from the yield curve. This an interesting capability as it allows to independently optimize deformations while parameters defining the yield curve could serve to adjust landfast ice and to a lesser extent sea ice drift. We investigated the impact of a non-normal flow rule in pan-Arctic simulations. Compared to the standard VP rheology, the non-normal flow rule leads to a more active sea ice cover with narrower linear kinematic features (LKFs) and a higher LKF density. The higher divergence with the non-normal flow rule causes an enhanced ice growth and larger Arctic sea ice volume. In idealized experiments, Ringeisen et al. (2021) showed that the non-normal flow rule can correct the unrealistic (too large) intersection angles between LKFs. However, in our pan-Arctic simulations, the non-normal flow rule does not correct the unrealistic intersection angles which are often around 90°. Results suggest that these frequent 90° angles are partly caused by the alignment of LKFs with the computational grid.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(11)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE), GDG Environnement (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.