Two Markov Solution Process Models for the Assessment of Planning in Problem Solving

Tower tasks are popular tools used to measure planning skills. The sequences of moves undertaken by the respondents in solving tower tasks might provide important and useful information to shed light on their planning skills. The article focuses on the distinction between a situation where planning occurs before action (pre-planning) from one where planning and action are interlaced all along the execution of the task (interim-planning). While the model for pre-planning was already developed by Stefanutti et al. (2021), an alternative model for the interim-planning is proposed. The two models are compared with one another in an empirical study. In accordance with the literature on the development of planning skills, the pre-planning model better fits data collected on individuals aged 14 on, while the interim-planning model displays a better fit with data collected on individuals aged 4-8. This result is further corroborated by the analysis of the time performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychometrika
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psy.2025.10042
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Markov Solution Process Models for the Assessment of Planning in Problem Solving

Andrea Brancaccio, Debora de Chiusole, Luca Stefanutti, Irene Pierluigi et al.
Psychometrika
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Two Markov Solution Process Models for the Assessment of Planning in Problem Solving

Andrea Brancaccio, Debora de Chiusole, Luca Stefanutti, Irene Pierluigi, Alice Bacherini, Sara Giovagnoli, Ottavia M. Epifania, Giulia Balboni, Noemi Mazzoni, Matteo Orsoni, Mariagrazia Benassi, Matilde Spinoso, Pasquale Anselmi
article en

Abstract

Tower tasks are popular tools used to measure planning skills. The sequences of moves undertaken by the respondents in solving tower tasks might provide important and useful information to shed light on their planning skills. The article focuses on the distinction between a situation where planning occurs before action (pre-planning) from one where planning and action are interlaced all along the execution of the task (interim-planning). While the model for pre-planning was already developed by Stefanutti et al. (2021), an alternative model for the interim-planning is proposed. The two models are compared with one another in an empirical study. In accordance with the literature on the development of planning skills, the pre-planning model better fits data collected on individuals aged 14 on, while the interim-planning model displays a better fit with data collected on individuals aged 4-8. This result is further corroborated by the analysis of the time performance.

PsychometrikaVol. 91(1)
University of Padua (IT), University of Perugia (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two Markov Solution Process Models for the Assessment of Planning in Problem Solving — Andrea Brancaccio, Debora de Chiusole, et al. · Psychometrika (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS