Intelligence as Typological Cognition: Revisiting Jungian Functions for Human and Artificial Minds

Traditional rationalist and task-based models of intelligence obscure the diverse cognitive processes underlying performance by focusing on abstract reason and observable outcomes. This paper argues that Carl Jung’s typological theory provides a more systematic framework, defining intelligence as a structured system of interacting cognitive functions. Applying this model to Artificial Intelligence reveals that AI, too, requires a balanced development of these functions and its output depends on the dynamic interactions of functions. This perspective critiques “sociomorphing”—optimising for surface-level task performance—as an imbalanced approach. It concludes by redefining “anthropomorphising” as a design benchmark that uses the principles of human psychic balance to guide AI toward more integrated and functionally aware outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025126018
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligence as Typological Cognition: Revisiting Jungian Functions for Human and Artificial Minds

Zezhen Ding
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Intelligence as Typological Cognition: Revisiting Jungian Functions for Human and Artificial Minds

Zezhen Ding
article en

Abstract

Traditional rationalist and task-based models of intelligence obscure the diverse cognitive processes underlying performance by focusing on abstract reason and observable outcomes. This paper argues that Carl Jung’s typological theory provides a more systematic framework, defining intelligence as a structured system of interacting cognitive functions. Applying this model to Artificial Intelligence reveals that AI, too, requires a balanced development of these functions and its output depends on the dynamic interactions of functions. This perspective critiques “sociomorphing”—optimising for surface-level task performance—as an imbalanced approach. It concludes by redefining “anthropomorphising” as a design benchmark that uses the principles of human psychic balance to guide AI toward more integrated and functionally aware outcomes.

Language Science (South Korea) (KR), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.