EFSA statement on the interpretation of FAIR principles for mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides

Abstract Among its objectives, the European Food Safety Authority working group on effect models in environmental risk assessment has worked towards the development and maintenance of a framework to facilitate the assessment of effect models within the scope of the European Food Safety Authority's activities. To fulfil this objective, the working group self‐tasked to lay the groundwork for interpreting the FAIR (i.e. Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reproducibility) guiding principles – originally developed for scientific data management and stewardship – for mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides. The working group identified three main areas in which the FAIR guiding principles may be applied, namely: (I) the data underlying a particular model (or model use), (II) the computer model and (III) the model assessment. The document explores existing resources that may support the implementation of the FAIR guiding principles and provides a specific interpretation of the principles for each of the areas relevant to mechanistic effect models. Important challenges and potential blockers are identified, but the working group argues that working towards more ‘FAIRness’ would ultimately lead to a more efficient review process and better integration of mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides, with benefits for all stakeholders. While the aim of the present exercise is to stimulate discussion within the modelling community and avoid being overly prescriptive, recommendations for future action are given to address some of the challenges.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9741
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFSA statement on the interpretation of FAIR principles for mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides

Andreas Focks, Alessio Ippolito, Alberto Linguadoca, Davide Gibin et al.
EFSA Journal
Agricultural safety and regulations
article

EFSA statement on the interpretation of FAIR principles for mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides

Andreas Focks, Alessio Ippolito, Alberto Linguadoca, Davide Gibin, Edoardo Carnesecchi, Ivana Teodorović, Sandrine Charles, Jonathan T. Haselman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Among its objectives, the European Food Safety Authority working group on effect models in environmental risk assessment has worked towards the development and maintenance of a framework to facilitate the assessment of effect models within the scope of the European Food Safety Authority's activities. To fulfil this objective, the working group self‐tasked to lay the groundwork for interpreting the FAIR (i.e. Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reproducibility) guiding principles – originally developed for scientific data management and stewardship – for mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides. The working group identified three main areas in which the FAIR guiding principles may be applied, namely: (I) the data underlying a particular model (or model use), (II) the computer model and (III) the model assessment. The document explores existing resources that may support the implementation of the FAIR guiding principles and provides a specific interpretation of the principles for each of the areas relevant to mechanistic effect models. Important challenges and potential blockers are identified, but the working group argues that working towards more ‘FAIRness’ would ultimately lead to a more efficient review process and better integration of mechanistic effect models in the regulatory environmental risk assessment of pesticides, with benefits for all stakeholders. While the aim of the present exercise is to stimulate discussion within the modelling community and avoid being overly prescriptive, recommendations for future action are given to address some of the challenges.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(11)
European Food Safety Authority
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Agricultural safety and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.