A review of lunar water extraction technologies: comparison, classification, and research gaps

Abstract Sustainable exploration of space can be greatly enhanced by the effective use of lunar resources. This review systematically evaluates current lunar water extraction technologies through comparative analysis of experimental and simulated setups, proposing a classification framework based on operational principles such as thermal, mechanical, convection-assisted, and ionisation extraction methods. For all 27 reviewed studies, a summary was compiled, including design, objective, environmental parameters, masses, and other relevant parameters. Despite considerable advancements, meaningful comparisons across studies remain challenging due to inconsistencies in data reporting, mostly due to sources having varying objectives. To address this, the authors suggest adopting a standardised reporting framework for water extraction technologies encompassing clear definitions of essential metrics like extraction and recovery efficiencies, power usage, and environmental conditions. Additional steps required to evaluate the entire water extraction process chain are further discussed. Identified research gaps include an end-to-end, comparable evaluation framework that accounts for pre- and post-extraction steps; comprehensive integration of extraction with vapour-capture; and development of scalable pilot systems, including large integrated tests and surface demonstrations. Addressing these areas through standardisation and collaborative research will significantly enhance technology development and mission planning efficiency for future lunar exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space and Planetary Resources
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44461-025-00005-4
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of lunar water extraction technologies: comparison, classification, and research gaps

Paul Zabel, Luca Kiewiet, Svenja Fälker
Space and Planetary Resources
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

A review of lunar water extraction technologies: comparison, classification, and research gaps

Paul Zabel, Luca Kiewiet, Svenja Fälker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sustainable exploration of space can be greatly enhanced by the effective use of lunar resources. This review systematically evaluates current lunar water extraction technologies through comparative analysis of experimental and simulated setups, proposing a classification framework based on operational principles such as thermal, mechanical, convection-assisted, and ionisation extraction methods. For all 27 reviewed studies, a summary was compiled, including design, objective, environmental parameters, masses, and other relevant parameters. Despite considerable advancements, meaningful comparisons across studies remain challenging due to inconsistencies in data reporting, mostly due to sources having varying objectives. To address this, the authors suggest adopting a standardised reporting framework for water extraction technologies encompassing clear definitions of essential metrics like extraction and recovery efficiencies, power usage, and environmental conditions. Additional steps required to evaluate the entire water extraction process chain are further discussed. Identified research gaps include an end-to-end, comparable evaluation framework that accounts for pre- and post-extraction steps; comprehensive integration of extraction with vapour-capture; and development of scalable pilot systems, including large integrated tests and surface demonstrations. Addressing these areas through standardisation and collaborative research will significantly enhance technology development and mission planning efficiency for future lunar exploration.

Space and Planetary ResourcesVol. 1(1)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.