Optimal Training Sample Sizes for U-Net-Based Tree Species Classification with Sentinel-2 Imagery

Detecting forest tree species distribution using satellite imagery with deep-learning models is essential for effective forest management. While sufficient training samples are crucial for developing deep-learning-based tree species classification models, creating these training samples requires significant resources. Therefore, understanding the optimal balance between model accuracy and training sample size is essential for efficient resource allocation. Here, we determined the optimal training sample size for forest tree species classification using Sentinel-2 imagery and the U-Net model. The study area comprised the Seoul–Gyeonggi region of South Korea, where the nine dominant tree species were selected for classification. We utilized multi-temporal Sentinel-2 imagery, incorporating spectral, vegetation, and textural features. Optimal points were identified using Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) regression. The maximum overall accuracy reached 61%, with 90% and 95% of the maximum accuracy with training sample sizes of 2.37%–2.67% and 4.42%–5.89%, respectively. The congeneric Pinus and Quercus groups had major confusion, with species-specific F1-scores ranging from 0.40 (Robinia pseudoacacia) to 0.75 (Pinus koraiensis). These results provide practical guidelines for efficient resource allocation in tree species classification. Rather than pursuing excessive data collection beyond the optimal point, integrating multiple sensor types can overcome existing limitations and enhance classification accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16111718
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Training Sample Sizes for U-Net-Based Tree Species Classification with Sentinel-2 Imagery

Sol-E Choi, Cheolho Lee, Hanbyol Woo, Heejae Lee
1 citations
Forests
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
article

Optimal Training Sample Sizes for U-Net-Based Tree Species Classification with Sentinel-2 Imagery

Sol-E Choi, Cheolho Lee, Hanbyol Woo, Heejae Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Detecting forest tree species distribution using satellite imagery with deep-learning models is essential for effective forest management. While sufficient training samples are crucial for developing deep-learning-based tree species classification models, creating these training samples requires significant resources. Therefore, understanding the optimal balance between model accuracy and training sample size is essential for efficient resource allocation. Here, we determined the optimal training sample size for forest tree species classification using Sentinel-2 imagery and the U-Net model. The study area comprised the Seoul–Gyeonggi region of South Korea, where the nine dominant tree species were selected for classification. We utilized multi-temporal Sentinel-2 imagery, incorporating spectral, vegetation, and textural features. Optimal points were identified using Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) regression. The maximum overall accuracy reached 61%, with 90% and 95% of the maximum accuracy with training sample sizes of 2.37%–2.67% and 4.42%–5.89%, respectively. The congeneric Pinus and Quercus groups had major confusion, with species-specific F1-scores ranging from 0.40 (Robinia pseudoacacia) to 0.75 (Pinus koraiensis). These results provide practical guidelines for efficient resource allocation in tree species classification. Rather than pursuing excessive data collection beyond the optimal point, integrating multiple sensor types can overcome existing limitations and enhance classification accuracy.

ForestsVol. 16(11)
Korea Forest Service (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.