Estimation of the Common Mean of Zero-Inflated Inverse Gaussian Distributions: Application to Road Accident Fatalities in Thailand

This study addresses the estimation of the common mean for the zero-inflated inverse Gaussian (ZIIG) distributions, a problem not previously explored. The performance of four interval estimation approaches was evaluated: the generalized confidence interval (GCI), parametric bootstrap, Bayesian, and highest posterior density (HPD). Simulation studies under varying sample sizes, zero-inflation probabilities, mean values, and shape parameters revealed notable differences in coverage probability (CP) and average length (AL). For small samples, the GCI and parametric bootstrap approaches often under-covered, particularly in highly skewed or heavily zero-inflated cases. In contrast, Bayesian and HPD intervals generally maintained coverage closer to the nominal 0.95 level, albeit with longer intervals. As sample size increased, all methods approached nominal coverage and produced shorter intervals, improving precision. Overall, the Bayesian and HPD approaches demonstrated strong robustness across conditions, with HPD intervals frequently achieving accurate coverage with shorter lengths. Finally, the proposed approaches were applied to real-world data on road accident fatalities in Thailand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17111944
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of the Common Mean of Zero-Inflated Inverse Gaussian Distributions: Application to Road Accident Fatalities in Thailand

Suparat Niwitpong, Sa‐Aat Niwitpong, Warisa Thangjai
Symmetry
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Estimation of the Common Mean of Zero-Inflated Inverse Gaussian Distributions: Application to Road Accident Fatalities in Thailand

Suparat Niwitpong, Sa‐Aat Niwitpong, Warisa Thangjai
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the estimation of the common mean for the zero-inflated inverse Gaussian (ZIIG) distributions, a problem not previously explored. The performance of four interval estimation approaches was evaluated: the generalized confidence interval (GCI), parametric bootstrap, Bayesian, and highest posterior density (HPD). Simulation studies under varying sample sizes, zero-inflation probabilities, mean values, and shape parameters revealed notable differences in coverage probability (CP) and average length (AL). For small samples, the GCI and parametric bootstrap approaches often under-covered, particularly in highly skewed or heavily zero-inflated cases. In contrast, Bayesian and HPD intervals generally maintained coverage closer to the nominal 0.95 level, albeit with longer intervals. As sample size increased, all methods approached nominal coverage and produced shorter intervals, improving precision. Overall, the Bayesian and HPD approaches demonstrated strong robustness across conditions, with HPD intervals frequently achieving accurate coverage with shorter lengths. Finally, the proposed approaches were applied to real-world data on road accident fatalities in Thailand.

SymmetryVol. 17(11)
Ramkhamhaeng University (TH), King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.