Rearward Seating Orientation Decreases Trust and Increases Motion Sickness in Autonomous Vehicles

As the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) progresses, new seating arrangements are emerging. Face-to-face seating is common in SAE L4 AV concepts and is intended to facilitate social interaction during autonomous driving, enabling previously unfeasible non-driving related tasks (NDRTs). However, this is countered by the unpopularity of rearward seating orientations, which is particularly pronounced in cars. In order to develop countermeasures to address this unpopularity, a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms is required. This study validates a model that predicts the acceptance of AVs and takes seating orientation into account. To this end, a study with N = 46 participants was conducted to investigate the influence of seating orientation on AV acceptance and related factors such as transparency, trust, and motion sickness. Additionally, internal human–machine interfaces (iHMIs) were evaluated in regard to their ability to compensate for the disadvantages of a rearward seating orientation. To achieve a realistic implementation of a fully functional SAE L4 AV, an experimental vehicle was equipped with a steering and pedal robot, performing self-driven journeys on a test track. The iHMIs provided information about upcoming maneuvers and detected road users. While engaged in a social NDRT, participants experienced a total of six journeys. Seating orientation and iHMI visualization were manipulated between journeys. Rearward-facing passengers showed lower levels of trust and higher levels of motion sickness than forward-facing passengers. However, the iHMIs had no effect on acceptance or related factors. Based on these findings, an updated version of the model is proposed, showing that rearward-facing passengers in autonomous vehicles pose a particular challenge for trust calibration and motion sickness mitigation. During NDRTs, iHMIs which depend on the attention of AV occupants for information transfer appear to be ineffective. Implications for future research and design of iHMIs to address this challenge are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212027
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rearward Seating Orientation Decreases Trust and Increases Motion Sickness in Autonomous Vehicles

Mark Vollrath, Lukas Rottmann, Aniella Johannsen, Alina Waldmann
Applied Sciences
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Rearward Seating Orientation Decreases Trust and Increases Motion Sickness in Autonomous Vehicles

Mark Vollrath, Lukas Rottmann, Aniella Johannsen, Alina Waldmann
article en

Abstract

As the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) progresses, new seating arrangements are emerging. Face-to-face seating is common in SAE L4 AV concepts and is intended to facilitate social interaction during autonomous driving, enabling previously unfeasible non-driving related tasks (NDRTs). However, this is countered by the unpopularity of rearward seating orientations, which is particularly pronounced in cars. In order to develop countermeasures to address this unpopularity, a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms is required. This study validates a model that predicts the acceptance of AVs and takes seating orientation into account. To this end, a study with N = 46 participants was conducted to investigate the influence of seating orientation on AV acceptance and related factors such as transparency, trust, and motion sickness. Additionally, internal human–machine interfaces (iHMIs) were evaluated in regard to their ability to compensate for the disadvantages of a rearward seating orientation. To achieve a realistic implementation of a fully functional SAE L4 AV, an experimental vehicle was equipped with a steering and pedal robot, performing self-driven journeys on a test track. The iHMIs provided information about upcoming maneuvers and detected road users. While engaged in a social NDRT, participants experienced a total of six journeys. Seating orientation and iHMI visualization were manipulated between journeys. Rearward-facing passengers showed lower levels of trust and higher levels of motion sickness than forward-facing passengers. However, the iHMIs had no effect on acceptance or related factors. Based on these findings, an updated version of the model is proposed, showing that rearward-facing passengers in autonomous vehicles pose a particular challenge for trust calibration and motion sickness mitigation. During NDRTs, iHMIs which depend on the attention of AV occupants for information transfer appear to be ineffective. Implications for future research and design of iHMIs to address this challenge are discussed.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(22)
Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.