When trust turns digital: why relational cues matter in online crime-reporting portals

Abstract Objectives To test whether trust in the police (a) improves the online crime-reporting experience and (b) increases support for digital reporting. To examine whether a procedurally just follow-up email and primed motivations enhance or amplify these effects. Methods In a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment, 638 UK participants reported a hypothetical crime online. Experimental conditions: trust prime, reporting motivation, follow-up communication and crime type. Outcomes: user experience (fair and efficient) and support for online reporting. Results Most participants felt the experience was fair and efficient. Support for online reporting was generally high. The trust prime improved both user experience and support. A procedurally-just follow-up email increased support but did not interact with trust. Motivation and crime type had no measurable effects. Conclusions Systems that engage trust help users interpret impersonal processes as procedurally fair and efficient. Lacking such cues, online reporting risks being a hollow transaction—undermining police legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09713-5
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When trust turns digital: why relational cues matter in online crime-reporting portals

Angus Chan, Youngsub Lee, Ben Bradford, Jonathan Jackson
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

When trust turns digital: why relational cues matter in online crime-reporting portals

Angus Chan, Youngsub Lee, Ben Bradford, Jonathan Jackson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To test whether trust in the police (a) improves the online crime-reporting experience and (b) increases support for digital reporting. To examine whether a procedurally just follow-up email and primed motivations enhance or amplify these effects. Methods In a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment, 638 UK participants reported a hypothetical crime online. Experimental conditions: trust prime, reporting motivation, follow-up communication and crime type. Outcomes: user experience (fair and efficient) and support for online reporting. Results Most participants felt the experience was fair and efficient. Support for online reporting was generally high. The trust prime improved both user experience and support. A procedurally-just follow-up email increased support but did not interact with trust. Motivation and crime type had no measurable effects. Conclusions Systems that engage trust help users interpret impersonal processes as procedurally fair and efficient. Lacking such cues, online reporting risks being a hollow transaction—undermining police legitimacy.

Journal of Experimental Criminology
The University of Sydney (AU), City, University of London (GB), University College London (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Economic and Social Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.