Determining neurophysiological responses to physical and moral disgust elicitors–A systematic literature review

Disgust is a common basic emotion with evolutionary roots in helping to avoid contaminants and illness. Moral disgust, however, is often reported in response to witnessing a moral violation or social boundary being crossed. Previous research has sought to understand if moral disgust is its own emotional state which derives from the more basic physical disgust, or if it is a blend of different emotions. To elucidate this relationship further, this review sought to systematically evaluate the methods in which research which has measured either physical disgust or moral disgust responses and identify common and separate physiological and neurological markers of these emotions. The review highlights that whilst there are common markers shared between physical and moral disgust, that this commonality depends instead on the type of moral violation or physical disgust elicitor. It is suggested that physical core disgust, and bodily moral or purity disgust are closely related, whereas physical animal-reminder disgust and socio-moral violations might elicit responses similar to anger or fear. The review recommends important considerations for future investigation of moral emotions, and highlights how stringent control of disgust elicitors is necessary to accurately measure the physiological and neurological markers of different types of disgust. Furthermore, the review highlights how other important considerations such as intention behind a violation and differences in perceived severity of different types of violation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiology & Behavior
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115172
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining neurophysiological responses to physical and moral disgust elicitors–A systematic literature review

Oliver Hawkins, Antonia Ypsilanti, Petra Examilioti
Physiology & Behavior
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Determining neurophysiological responses to physical and moral disgust elicitors–A systematic literature review

Oliver Hawkins, Antonia Ypsilanti, Petra Examilioti
article en

Abstract

Disgust is a common basic emotion with evolutionary roots in helping to avoid contaminants and illness. Moral disgust, however, is often reported in response to witnessing a moral violation or social boundary being crossed. Previous research has sought to understand if moral disgust is its own emotional state which derives from the more basic physical disgust, or if it is a blend of different emotions. To elucidate this relationship further, this review sought to systematically evaluate the methods in which research which has measured either physical disgust or moral disgust responses and identify common and separate physiological and neurological markers of these emotions. The review highlights that whilst there are common markers shared between physical and moral disgust, that this commonality depends instead on the type of moral violation or physical disgust elicitor. It is suggested that physical core disgust, and bodily moral or purity disgust are closely related, whereas physical animal-reminder disgust and socio-moral violations might elicit responses similar to anger or fear. The review recommends important considerations for future investigation of moral emotions, and highlights how stringent control of disgust elicitors is necessary to accurately measure the physiological and neurological markers of different types of disgust. Furthermore, the review highlights how other important considerations such as intention behind a violation and differences in perceived severity of different types of violation.

Physiology & BehaviorVol. 304
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Determining neurophysiological responses to physical and moral disgust elicitors–A systematic literature review — Oliver Hawkins, Antonia Ypsilanti, et al. · Physiology & Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS