Navigating the glass ceiling, gender equity and overcoming barriers in rural PK-12 educational leadership

Purpose The purpose of this study was to help determine the significant barriers women in one Midwestern US State (with 70% of the 516 traditional school districts considered rural) face in advancement and in what ways these women could become more successful in obtaining upper-level educational leadership positions in PK-12 educational institutions. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a Delphi method, the researchers gathered and refined insights from women currently holding leadership roles in one Midwestern state. During three rounds of mixed-methods online surveys, participants identified barriers that perpetuate the “glass ceiling.” Findings The results revealed five main barriers that hinder women’s professional advancement: perceptions of emotional decision-making, male networks that exclude women, bias favoring men as more qualified leaders, stereotypes about women’s areas of expertise and the perceived lack of skills in facilities and operations. These findings lead to what needs to be put in place to assist women in PK-12 education in obtaining higher positions of authority. Research limitations/implications Research limitations include the geographic scope since it was limited to a single Midwestern state with rural female PK-12 educational leaders, a small sample size of 25 participants of women in rural educational leadership, whose perspectives may not be generalizable to suburban and urban settings, thus causing bias. While the study acknowledged intersectionality, participant demographics were not sufficiently detailed to ensure representation of women from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. An additional limitation was reliance on self-reported data, which introduced the possibility of recall or social desirability bias as participant perspectives may be limited to only their context. Originality/value The study revealed the need for specific professional development on technical aspects of educational leadership for women as well as the establishment of supportive networks to provide both mentors and sponsors. By educational institutions changing policies, practices, and support, more widespread upper-level educational leadership positions can become a reality for women. The findings provide suggestions for improving opportunities within PK-12 educational settings for the advancement of women into leadership positions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Administration
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-01-2025-0004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the glass ceiling, gender equity and overcoming barriers in rural PK-12 educational leadership

Jo Nell Wood, Amanda Dawn Wood, Jaime E. Welborn, Beth Mulvey et al.
1 citations
Journal of Educational Administration
Mentoring and Academic Development
2.44
article

Navigating the glass ceiling, gender equity and overcoming barriers in rural PK-12 educational leadership

Jo Nell Wood, Amanda Dawn Wood, Jaime E. Welborn, Beth Mulvey, Donna Louise Jahnke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to help determine the significant barriers women in one Midwestern US State (with 70% of the 516 traditional school districts considered rural) face in advancement and in what ways these women could become more successful in obtaining upper-level educational leadership positions in PK-12 educational institutions. Design/methodology/approach This study employed a Delphi method, the researchers gathered and refined insights from women currently holding leadership roles in one Midwestern state. During three rounds of mixed-methods online surveys, participants identified barriers that perpetuate the “glass ceiling.” Findings The results revealed five main barriers that hinder women’s professional advancement: perceptions of emotional decision-making, male networks that exclude women, bias favoring men as more qualified leaders, stereotypes about women’s areas of expertise and the perceived lack of skills in facilities and operations. These findings lead to what needs to be put in place to assist women in PK-12 education in obtaining higher positions of authority. Research limitations/implications Research limitations include the geographic scope since it was limited to a single Midwestern state with rural female PK-12 educational leaders, a small sample size of 25 participants of women in rural educational leadership, whose perspectives may not be generalizable to suburban and urban settings, thus causing bias. While the study acknowledged intersectionality, participant demographics were not sufficiently detailed to ensure representation of women from diverse racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. An additional limitation was reliance on self-reported data, which introduced the possibility of recall or social desirability bias as participant perspectives may be limited to only their context. Originality/value The study revealed the need for specific professional development on technical aspects of educational leadership for women as well as the establishment of supportive networks to provide both mentors and sponsors. By educational institutions changing policies, practices, and support, more widespread upper-level educational leadership positions can become a reality for women. The findings provide suggestions for improving opportunities within PK-12 educational settings for the advancement of women into leadership positions.

Journal of Educational AdministrationVol. 64(2)
Saint Louis University (ES), University of Central Missouri (US), Midwest University (US), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mentoring and Academic Development
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.