Which Treaties Override Inconsistent Domestic Legislation Under Article 117(1) of the Italian Constitution? Taking Stock of a Quarter-Century of Practice

Abstract The present contribution seeks to shed light on which treaties enjoy a rank higher than domestic legislation in the Italian legal order by taking stock of 25 years of practice since the entry into force of the amendment to Article 117(1) of the Constitution, imposing a duty on lawmaking authorities to respect international law obligations. It aims to demonstrate that all treaties validly concluded by Italy and duly incorporated into its legal system can equally limit the legislative powers of the State and its Regions. Any alternative solution would ultimately risk jeopardising the principle of openness to, or respect for, international treaty obligations by the Italian legal system, as well as, more practically, the stability and certainty of international relations based on agreements to which Italy is a party. The analysis focuses on the case law of Italian highest courts , i.e., the Corte Costituzionale and the Corte di Cassazione, as well as on the practice of other constitutional bodies, especially the President of the Republic .

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116133-03401009
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Treaties Override Inconsistent Domestic Legislation Under Article 117(1) of the Italian Constitution? Taking Stock of a Quarter-Century of Practice

Riccardo Pavoni, Donato Greco
The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online
Gender and Women's Rights
article

Which Treaties Override Inconsistent Domestic Legislation Under Article 117(1) of the Italian Constitution? Taking Stock of a Quarter-Century of Practice

Riccardo Pavoni, Donato Greco
article en

Abstract

Abstract The present contribution seeks to shed light on which treaties enjoy a rank higher than domestic legislation in the Italian legal order by taking stock of 25 years of practice since the entry into force of the amendment to Article 117(1) of the Constitution, imposing a duty on lawmaking authorities to respect international law obligations. It aims to demonstrate that all treaties validly concluded by Italy and duly incorporated into its legal system can equally limit the legislative powers of the State and its Regions. Any alternative solution would ultimately risk jeopardising the principle of openness to, or respect for, international treaty obligations by the Italian legal system, as well as, more practically, the stability and certainty of international relations based on agreements to which Italy is a party. The analysis focuses on the case law of Italian highest courts , i.e., the Corte Costituzionale and the Corte di Cassazione, as well as on the practice of other constitutional bodies, especially the President of the Republic .

The Italian Yearbook of International Law OnlineVol. 34(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Gender and Women's Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Treaties Override Inconsistent Domestic Legislation Under Article 117(1) of the Italian Constitution? Taking Stock of a Quarter-Century of Practice — Riccardo Pavoni, Donato Greco · The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS