A psychometric evaluation of the coping self-efficacy scale among LGBTQ+ Veterans

Due to unique stressors faced by LGBTQ+ Veterans, it is important to understand how existing strengths, like coping self-efficacy, can be leveraged for health promotion efforts to improve outcomes for this population. Before clinical trials and program evaluation work is possible, critical measurement issues must be addressed. The present study advances psychometric testing of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) among LGBTQ+ Veterans participating in the Pride in All Who Served (PRIDE) program including use of dynamic fit indices for factor structure evaluation. Validity indicators were chosen based on guidance from the Behavioral Model of Health Service Utilization. Cross-sectional data collected for clinical program evaluation purposes were drawn from participants' pre-intervention questionnaires (<i>N</i> = 297). Data included self-reported demographics, coping self-efficacy, and health service use. Findings suggested a three-factor (i.e. problem-focused, thought-stopping, and use of social support) CSES structure with good to excellent internal reliability. For convergent validity, coping self-efficacy domains were associated with LGBTQ+ Veteran perceived health status, health behaviors, and service satisfaction in expected directions. Overall, our findings support the use of the CSES among LGBTQ+ Veteran populations to measure perceived coping self-efficacy. Recommendations for future research, psychometric testing, and clinical utility of the CSES are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Psychology
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2586984
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A psychometric evaluation of the coping self-efficacy scale among LGBTQ+ Veterans

Michelle M. Hilgeman, Heather A. Sperry, Sierra Phillips, Teddy Bishop et al.
Military Psychology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

A psychometric evaluation of the coping self-efficacy scale among LGBTQ+ Veterans

Michelle M. Hilgeman, Heather A. Sperry, Sierra Phillips, Teddy Bishop, Robert J. Cramer, Sam Cacace, Skyler D. Prowten, Michelle C. Wilcox
article en

Abstract

Due to unique stressors faced by LGBTQ+ Veterans, it is important to understand how existing strengths, like coping self-efficacy, can be leveraged for health promotion efforts to improve outcomes for this population. Before clinical trials and program evaluation work is possible, critical measurement issues must be addressed. The present study advances psychometric testing of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) among LGBTQ+ Veterans participating in the Pride in All Who Served (PRIDE) program including use of dynamic fit indices for factor structure evaluation. Validity indicators were chosen based on guidance from the Behavioral Model of Health Service Utilization. Cross-sectional data collected for clinical program evaluation purposes were drawn from participants' pre-intervention questionnaires (<i>N</i> = 297). Data included self-reported demographics, coping self-efficacy, and health service use. Findings suggested a three-factor (i.e. problem-focused, thought-stopping, and use of social support) CSES structure with good to excellent internal reliability. For convergent validity, coping self-efficacy domains were associated with LGBTQ+ Veteran perceived health status, health behaviors, and service satisfaction in expected directions. Overall, our findings support the use of the CSES among LGBTQ+ Veteran populations to measure perceived coping self-efficacy. Recommendations for future research, psychometric testing, and clinical utility of the CSES are discussed.

Military Psychology
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), University of Alabama (US), VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System (US), Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US), Tomah VA Medical Center (US), Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.