Vasoactive breathing manoeuvres as an effective coronary vasodilator in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective comparative oxygenation-sensitive CMR study
Abstract Aims In the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, vasoactive breathing manoeuvres have been proposed as a potential alternative to pharmacological vasodilator stress. However, it remains unclear whether the resultant physiological responses are comparable to those induced by adenosine in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to compare the myocardial oxygenation responses to a hyperventilation breath-hold (HVBH) manoeuvre with those elicited by adenosine, using oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (OS-CMR). Methods and results Patients with suspected angina underwent 3-Tesla OS-CMR with (i) HVBH and (ii) adenosine (140–210 μg/kg/min) prior to invasive coronary angiography. The primary outcome was the maximal percentage change in OS-CMR signal intensity for (i) HVBH [breathing-induced myocardial oxygenation reserve (B-MOREmax)] and (ii) adenosine [adenosine-induced myocardial oxygenation reserve (A-MORE)]. Significant CAD was defined as fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 in epicardial vessels ≥2 mm diameter. From 53 prospectively recruited patients, 44 had complete, paired OS-CMR sequences (mean age 69 ± 9 years, 75% male, CAD prevalence 59%). The HVBH manoeuvre elicited a myocardial oxygenation response comparable to that of adenosine (B-MOREmax 7.0 ± 9.5% vs. A-MORE 8.6 ± 12.3%, mean difference: −1.6% [−6.0%, 2.8%]; P = 0.469), which remained similar at the segmental level following adjustment for age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, CAD, and infarction (mean difference: −1.7% [−4.0%, 0.5%]; P = 0.126). Conclusion In patients with suspected CAD, HVBH induces a myocardial oxygenation response comparable to that elicited by adenosine. Future prospective studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of OS-CMR combined with vasoactive breathing manoeuvres for detecting significant CAD are warranted.
Authors
- Anju Velvet
- Joanne Wormleighton
- Elizabeth Hillier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-4680)
- Mohamed Elshibly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-5141)
- Gerry P McCann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-8448)
- Andrew Ladwiniec (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1551-0594)
- Kelly Parke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1842-3290)
- Matthias G. Friedrich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1204-5647)
- Simran Shergill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4761-7297)
- Sandeep S Hothi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-9190)
- Charley Ann Budgeon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-5561)
- David Adlam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-9884)
- Aida Moafi
- Jayanth R. Arnold (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-8374)
- Rachel England
Institutions
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Glenfield Hospital (GB)
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
- NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit (GB)
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf141
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.36
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- British Heart Foundation
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
- NIHR Leicester Clinical Research Facility