Battle Birds

Contemporary perceptions of the figure of the fighting-cock are shaped by a human-built avian architectural history saturated with masculine gender identities and perceived as conflicting with prevailing social norms. The fighting-cock appears in literature and art as a symbol of masculine valour, a surrogate human, or an avatar enacting a form of animality deemed socially unacceptable. This perception differs markedly from other social human–animal interactions and constructions, which accept – or consciously ignore – other gendered uses of animals. Hens, for instance, are an accepted part of our landscape and rendered largely passive, their bodies consumed, literally and visually. And yet the fighting-cock is a human construct, shaped by the manipulation of a territorial instinct, raised in isolation and conditioned to fight. His body is placed within a purpose-built architectural space of action – the cockpit – connecting prosthetic violence to architectural spectacle. This project argues that the fighting-cock’s material and mythological presence calls for a re-imagining. Through a critique prompted by an invitation to design and share an object, the figure of the fighting-cock becomes a site through which to challenge gendered animal architectures and imagine more-than-human futures. Read the full article online at: https://drawingon.org/Issue-04-04-Battle-Birds

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Drawing On Journal of Architectural Research by Design
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2218/r28fgj13
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Battle Birds

Natalie Lis
Drawing On Journal of Architectural Research by Design
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Battle Birds

Natalie Lis
article en

Abstract

Contemporary perceptions of the figure of the fighting-cock are shaped by a human-built avian architectural history saturated with masculine gender identities and perceived as conflicting with prevailing social norms. The fighting-cock appears in literature and art as a symbol of masculine valour, a surrogate human, or an avatar enacting a form of animality deemed socially unacceptable. This perception differs markedly from other social human–animal interactions and constructions, which accept – or consciously ignore – other gendered uses of animals. Hens, for instance, are an accepted part of our landscape and rendered largely passive, their bodies consumed, literally and visually. And yet the fighting-cock is a human construct, shaped by the manipulation of a territorial instinct, raised in isolation and conditioned to fight. His body is placed within a purpose-built architectural space of action – the cockpit – connecting prosthetic violence to architectural spectacle. This project argues that the fighting-cock’s material and mythological presence calls for a re-imagining. Through a critique prompted by an invitation to design and share an object, the figure of the fighting-cock becomes a site through which to challenge gendered animal architectures and imagine more-than-human futures. Read the full article online at: https://drawingon.org/Issue-04-04-Battle-Birds

Drawing On Journal of Architectural Research by DesignVol. 4
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.