Examining subjective views of the aging process in older adults: a systematic review following the COSMIN methodology

This systematic review is intended to identify, categorize, and evaluate instruments assessing generalized and personal views of aging (VoA) in older adults as well as how these instruments have addressed views of changes in cognition with aging. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the review was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42023407986). Studies presenting VoA instruments, also including a specific focus on views of changes in cognition with aging, were identified using the Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. Based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, risk of bias and GRADE assessments were conducted for each instrument. Of the 3,578 records emerged, 77 studies assessing measurement properties of 26 VoA instruments in samples of older adults were included. These instruments reflected diverse generalized and personal VoA concepts; few ones assessed or included items depicting views of changes in cognition with aging, with memory being the most frequently addressed cognitive domain. Notwithstanding psychometric and measurement issues, this review provides a comprehensive summary of existing instruments assessing subjective VoA, which have clinical and applied utility in promoting healthy aging, especially for older adults at risk of pathological aging. The development and validation of new VoA scales, particularly to assess views on age-related cognitive changes with aging, is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06472-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining subjective views of the aging process in older adults: a systematic review following the COSMIN methodology

Maria Letizia Tanturri, Riccardo Domenicucci, Antonio Paoli, Enrico Sella et al.
2 citations
BMC Geriatrics
Aging and Gerontology Research
7.20
article

Examining subjective views of the aging process in older adults: a systematic review following the COSMIN methodology

Maria Letizia Tanturri, Riccardo Domenicucci, Antonio Paoli, Enrico Sella, Elena Carbone, Erika Borella
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This systematic review is intended to identify, categorize, and evaluate instruments assessing generalized and personal views of aging (VoA) in older adults as well as how these instruments have addressed views of changes in cognition with aging. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the review was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42023407986). Studies presenting VoA instruments, also including a specific focus on views of changes in cognition with aging, were identified using the Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. Based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, risk of bias and GRADE assessments were conducted for each instrument. Of the 3,578 records emerged, 77 studies assessing measurement properties of 26 VoA instruments in samples of older adults were included. These instruments reflected diverse generalized and personal VoA concepts; few ones assessed or included items depicting views of changes in cognition with aging, with memory being the most frequently addressed cognitive domain. Notwithstanding psychometric and measurement issues, this review provides a comprehensive summary of existing instruments assessing subjective VoA, which have clinical and applied utility in promoting healthy aging, especially for older adults at risk of pathological aging. The development and validation of new VoA scales, particularly to assess views on age-related cognitive changes with aging, is warranted.

BMC GeriatricsVol. 25(1)
University of Padua (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Aging and Gerontology Research
7.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.