Shame or What Makes Irrational Social Anxiety Rational

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is defined as a pathological fear of social interactions in which an individual may be negatively evaluated by others. The crucial component of assessing the state as clinical is the 'context-insensitivity' of the fear-i.e., the negative evaluation does not have any tangible repercussions, or the evaluation is not as detrimentally negative, as the patient presumes. However, this model excludes the role of self-conscious emotions, specifically shame, in aggravating social fears. This article models shame as an emotion that is highly aversive, unpredictable, and resistant to metacognitive regulation, which entails a perspective that SAD is the product of high shame-proneness and the inability to voluntarily mitigate it. The evidence of mutual correlates, such as socially prescribed perfectionism and treatment outcomes of cognitive and behavioral therapeutic modalities, is used to justify the argument. The article suggests the possibility of implementing humor as a supplement to a standard SAD-treatment self-regulation strategy that would allow subjects to control the emergence of their shame more efficiently. Finally, a potential randomized control trial study design is proposed to test the perspective outlined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222891
Primary Topic
Emotions and Moral Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shame or What Makes Irrational Social Anxiety Rational

Justin Paul Laplante, Artemiy Leonov
Healthcare
Emotions and Moral Behavior
article

Shame or What Makes Irrational Social Anxiety Rational

Justin Paul Laplante, Artemiy Leonov
article en

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is defined as a pathological fear of social interactions in which an individual may be negatively evaluated by others. The crucial component of assessing the state as clinical is the 'context-insensitivity' of the fear-i.e., the negative evaluation does not have any tangible repercussions, or the evaluation is not as detrimentally negative, as the patient presumes. However, this model excludes the role of self-conscious emotions, specifically shame, in aggravating social fears. This article models shame as an emotion that is highly aversive, unpredictable, and resistant to metacognitive regulation, which entails a perspective that SAD is the product of high shame-proneness and the inability to voluntarily mitigate it. The evidence of mutual correlates, such as socially prescribed perfectionism and treatment outcomes of cognitive and behavioral therapeutic modalities, is used to justify the argument. The article suggests the possibility of implementing humor as a supplement to a standard SAD-treatment self-regulation strategy that would allow subjects to control the emergence of their shame more efficiently. Finally, a potential randomized control trial study design is proposed to test the perspective outlined.

HealthcareVol. 13(22)
University of Connecticut (US), University of West Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Emotions and Moral Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shame or What Makes Irrational Social Anxiety Rational — Justin Paul Laplante, Artemiy Leonov · Healthcare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS