Comparison of Virtual Dose Simulator and K-Factor Methods for Effective Dose Assessment in Thoracic CT

<b>Rationale and Objective:</b> Medical imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), is the largest man-made contributor to collective radiation exposure. This study compares methods for assessing CT radiation dose, focusing on thoracic examinations. <b>Population investigated:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 3956 non-contrast thoracic CT exams from 1553 females (mean age 70 ± 12 years) and 2403 males (mean age 69 ± 12 years). <b>Methods:</b> Data were acquired using a Siemens Somatom Force CT-Scanner (installed in 2015). Exposure parameters and patient somatic data were recorded and used as inputs for the Virtual Dose Simulator (VDS), which served as the gold standard for effective dose (ED<sup>ref</sup>) measurement. Additionally, ED was calculated using two ICRP-103 K-factor methods: Shrimpton et al. (ED<sup>shr</sup>) and Romanyukha et al. (ED<sup>rom</sup>). <b>Results:</b> Regression analysis demonstrated strong linear relationships between ED<sup>ref</sup> and both weight and BMI (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.84), with ED<sup>ref</sup> values ranging from 1.55 to 4.59 mSv. Even stronger linear relationships were observed between ED<sup>ref</sup> and CT scanner tube current, particularly for women (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93) and men (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90). Similar trends emerged for dose-length product (DLP), which showed high correlations for both women (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95) and men (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94). Compared to VDS, ED<sup>rom</sup> underestimated women's doses by 10% and slightly overestimated men's doses by 1%, while ED<sup>shr</sup> underestimated the effective dose by 18% for women and 9% for men. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates that K-factor methods provide a simple, efficient, and clinically practical approach for both individual cumulative dose monitoring (critical for patients requiring repeated imaging) and population-level dose assessment (essential for epidemiological risk evaluation). The high reliability of K-factor-based estimates, as demonstrated in this work, underscores their potential for integration into clinical practice to enhance dose optimization and patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tomography
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11110128
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Virtual Dose Simulator and K-Factor Methods for Effective Dose Assessment in Thoracic CT

Roch Listz Maurice
Tomography
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Comparison of Virtual Dose Simulator and K-Factor Methods for Effective Dose Assessment in Thoracic CT

Roch Listz Maurice
article en

Abstract

<b>Rationale and Objective:</b> Medical imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), is the largest man-made contributor to collective radiation exposure. This study compares methods for assessing CT radiation dose, focusing on thoracic examinations. <b>Population investigated:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 3956 non-contrast thoracic CT exams from 1553 females (mean age 70 ± 12 years) and 2403 males (mean age 69 ± 12 years). <b>Methods:</b> Data were acquired using a Siemens Somatom Force CT-Scanner (installed in 2015). Exposure parameters and patient somatic data were recorded and used as inputs for the Virtual Dose Simulator (VDS), which served as the gold standard for effective dose (ED<sup>ref</sup>) measurement. Additionally, ED was calculated using two ICRP-103 K-factor methods: Shrimpton et al. (ED<sup>shr</sup>) and Romanyukha et al. (ED<sup>rom</sup>). <b>Results:</b> Regression analysis demonstrated strong linear relationships between ED<sup>ref</sup> and both weight and BMI (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.84), with ED<sup>ref</sup> values ranging from 1.55 to 4.59 mSv. Even stronger linear relationships were observed between ED<sup>ref</sup> and CT scanner tube current, particularly for women (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93) and men (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90). Similar trends emerged for dose-length product (DLP), which showed high correlations for both women (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95) and men (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94). Compared to VDS, ED<sup>rom</sup> underestimated women's doses by 10% and slightly overestimated men's doses by 1%, while ED<sup>shr</sup> underestimated the effective dose by 18% for women and 9% for men. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates that K-factor methods provide a simple, efficient, and clinically practical approach for both individual cumulative dose monitoring (critical for patients requiring repeated imaging) and population-level dose assessment (essential for epidemiological risk evaluation). The high reliability of K-factor-based estimates, as demonstrated in this work, underscores their potential for integration into clinical practice to enhance dose optimization and patient safety.

TomographyVol. 11(11)
Santé Montérégie (CA)
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Ministère de la Santé
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.