What’s in an App? Scoping Review and Quality Assessment of Clinically Available Hearing-Aid-Connected Apps

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Mobile health (mHealth) tools, such as smartphone apps, support person-centred care for persons with hearing loss engaging in the hearing aid management process. Hearing-aid-connected apps are increasingly common in audiological care, making it important to evaluate their availability and quality for clinicians, developers, and end-users. This scoping review aimed to identify, summarize, and synthesize information on clinically available hearing-aid-connected apps and evaluate their quality. <b>Methods</b>: A search of the Apple App Store (Canada) was conducted in August 2024 to identify current hearing-aid-connected apps that support hearing aid management. Metadata and features were extracted, and app quality was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Quality was assessed across four objective domains (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information) and one subjective domain. <b>Results</b>: Apps had varying levels of metadata detail, including updates, compatibility, and target populations. All apps included common hearing aid controls (e.g., volume adjustment, microphone directionality), while more specialized features (tinnitus management, health tracking, remote clinician support) varied. High-performing apps scored significantly higher in engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and subjective quality, and all apps scored low in information quality, particularly for evidence and credibility. <b>Conclusions</b>: Findings highlight the need for transparent and informative metadata reporting and patient-centred design to improve clinical awareness, usability, and uptake of hearing-aid-connected apps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15060157
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s in an App? Scoping Review and Quality Assessment of Clinically Available Hearing-Aid-Connected Apps

Robin O’Hagan, Danielle Glista, Jana Bataineh, Kate Pfingstgraef
Audiology Research
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

What’s in an App? Scoping Review and Quality Assessment of Clinically Available Hearing-Aid-Connected Apps

Robin O’Hagan, Danielle Glista, Jana Bataineh, Kate Pfingstgraef
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Mobile health (mHealth) tools, such as smartphone apps, support person-centred care for persons with hearing loss engaging in the hearing aid management process. Hearing-aid-connected apps are increasingly common in audiological care, making it important to evaluate their availability and quality for clinicians, developers, and end-users. This scoping review aimed to identify, summarize, and synthesize information on clinically available hearing-aid-connected apps and evaluate their quality. <b>Methods</b>: A search of the Apple App Store (Canada) was conducted in August 2024 to identify current hearing-aid-connected apps that support hearing aid management. Metadata and features were extracted, and app quality was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Quality was assessed across four objective domains (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information) and one subjective domain. <b>Results</b>: Apps had varying levels of metadata detail, including updates, compatibility, and target populations. All apps included common hearing aid controls (e.g., volume adjustment, microphone directionality), while more specialized features (tinnitus management, health tracking, remote clinician support) varied. High-performing apps scored significantly higher in engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and subjective quality, and all apps scored low in information quality, particularly for evidence and credibility. <b>Conclusions</b>: Findings highlight the need for transparent and informative metadata reporting and patient-centred design to improve clinical awareness, usability, and uptake of hearing-aid-connected apps.

Audiology ResearchVol. 15(6)
Western University (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What’s in an App? Scoping Review and Quality Assessment of Clinically Available Hearing-Aid-Connected Apps — Robin O’Hagan, Danielle Glista, et al. · Audiology Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS