Optimizers for stabilizing likelihood-free inference

A growing number of applications in particle physics and beyond use neural networks as unbinned likelihood ratio estimators applied to real or simulated data. Precision requirements on the inference tasks demand a high-level of stability from these networks, which are affected by the stochastic nature of training. We show how physics concepts can be used to stabilize network training through a physics-inspired optimizer. In particular, the energy conserving descent (ECD) optimization framework uses classical Hamiltonian dynamics on the space of network parameters to reduce the dependence on the initial conditions while also stabilizing the result near the minimum of the loss function. We develop a version of this optimizer known as <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:msub> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">ECD</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mi>q</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>1</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:msub> </a:mrow> </a:math> , which has few free hyperparameters with limited ranges guided by physical reasoning. We apply <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:msub> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">ECD</d:mi> </d:mrow> <d:mrow> <d:mi>q</d:mi> <d:mo>=</d:mo> <d:mn>1</d:mn> </d:mrow> </d:msub> </d:math> to representative likelihood-ratio estimation tasks in particle physics and find on average that it out-performs the widely used Adam optimizer. We expect that ECD will be a useful tool for wide array of data-limited problems, where it is computationally expensive to exhaustively optimize hyperparameters and mitigate fluctuations with ensembling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/x88j-mv39
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizers for stabilizing likelihood-free inference

G. Bruno De Luca, Benjamin Nachman, Eva Silverstein, Henry Zheng
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
2.48
article

Optimizers for stabilizing likelihood-free inference

G. Bruno De Luca, Benjamin Nachman, Eva Silverstein, Henry Zheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A growing number of applications in particle physics and beyond use neural networks as unbinned likelihood ratio estimators applied to real or simulated data. Precision requirements on the inference tasks demand a high-level of stability from these networks, which are affected by the stochastic nature of training. We show how physics concepts can be used to stabilize network training through a physics-inspired optimizer. In particular, the energy conserving descent (ECD) optimization framework uses classical Hamiltonian dynamics on the space of network parameters to reduce the dependence on the initial conditions while also stabilizing the result near the minimum of the loss function. We develop a version of this optimizer known as <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:msub> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">ECD</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mi>q</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>1</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:msub> </a:mrow> </a:math> , which has few free hyperparameters with limited ranges guided by physical reasoning. We apply <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:msub> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">ECD</d:mi> </d:mrow> <d:mrow> <d:mi>q</d:mi> <d:mo>=</d:mo> <d:mn>1</d:mn> </d:mrow> </d:msub> </d:math> to representative likelihood-ratio estimation tasks in particle physics and find on average that it out-performs the widely used Adam optimizer. We expect that ECD will be a useful tool for wide array of data-limited problems, where it is computationally expensive to exhaustively optimize hyperparameters and mitigate fluctuations with ensembling.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(9)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California System (US), Instituto de Física Teórica (ES), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.