4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction

Abstract This paper examines the interaction between humans and large language models (LLMs) through the lens of 4E cognition, which encompasses embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended cognitive processes, to provide a comprehensive understanding of their relational dynamics. It argues that LLMs should not be conceived of in terms of objects but be understood as a processual and relational phenomenon that co-constitutes human agency in a shared sociotechnical environment. As such, the paper reframes AI as an interactive medium of enactive and extended human action. By focusing on the relational entanglement of social databases, dynamic patterns, and algorithmic structures, the paper proposes a 4E-compatible connectionist account of AI—one that understands AI not only as a technological artifact but as a co-evolving component of the extended cognitive ecology of human life, shaping and shaped by enactive practices, intentions, and norms. Finally, the paper discusses the limits of AI, discussing the problem of AI hallucination and collapse from a 4E cognition perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00595-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction

Jörg U. Noller
3 citations
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Embodied and Extended Cognition
4.29
article

4E cognition and the coevolution of human–AI interaction

Jörg U. Noller
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the interaction between humans and large language models (LLMs) through the lens of 4E cognition, which encompasses embodied, embedded, enactive, and extended cognitive processes, to provide a comprehensive understanding of their relational dynamics. It argues that LLMs should not be conceived of in terms of objects but be understood as a processual and relational phenomenon that co-constitutes human agency in a shared sociotechnical environment. As such, the paper reframes AI as an interactive medium of enactive and extended human action. By focusing on the relational entanglement of social databases, dynamic patterns, and algorithmic structures, the paper proposes a 4E-compatible connectionist account of AI—one that understands AI not only as a technological artifact but as a co-evolving component of the extended cognitive ecology of human life, shaping and shaped by enactive practices, intentions, and norms. Finally, the paper discusses the limits of AI, discussing the problem of AI hallucination and collapse from a 4E cognition perspective.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 5(1)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.