The Intra‐ <scp>EU</scp> Relocation Scheme of 2015: A Test Run for a Dublin Reform

ABSTRACT In 2015, the first obligatory scheme re‐distributing forced migrants from Italy and Greece to other EU member states was launched. The scheme anticipated the intra‐EU relocation of 160,000 people in 2 years. Ultimately, as few as 34,705 have actually been resettled. Drawing on Bourdieu's field‐theoretical approach, this paper treats the relocation scheme as an attempt to appease conflicts over responsibility‐sharing by integrating a relocation procedure into the Dublin system. In so doing, the scheme paved the way for the new solidarity mechanism which will enter into force in 2026 and targets at 30,000 relocations each year. Based on a qualitative investigation, the paper analyses the administrative design of the relocation scheme, and how this implied a redefinition of responsibilities within the European field of asylum administration. Second, the paper works out how this triggered struggles around the scheme's implementation and works out actors' relative capacity of enforcement and refusal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Migration
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70112
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Intra‐ EU Relocation Scheme of 2015: A Test Run for a Dublin Reform

Carolin Nieswandt
International Migration
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

The Intra‐ EU Relocation Scheme of 2015: A Test Run for a Dublin Reform

Carolin Nieswandt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2015, the first obligatory scheme re‐distributing forced migrants from Italy and Greece to other EU member states was launched. The scheme anticipated the intra‐EU relocation of 160,000 people in 2 years. Ultimately, as few as 34,705 have actually been resettled. Drawing on Bourdieu's field‐theoretical approach, this paper treats the relocation scheme as an attempt to appease conflicts over responsibility‐sharing by integrating a relocation procedure into the Dublin system. In so doing, the scheme paved the way for the new solidarity mechanism which will enter into force in 2026 and targets at 30,000 relocations each year. Based on a qualitative investigation, the paper analyses the administrative design of the relocation scheme, and how this implied a redefinition of responsibilities within the European field of asylum administration. Second, the paper works out how this triggered struggles around the scheme's implementation and works out actors' relative capacity of enforcement and refusal.

International MigrationVol. 63(6)
University of Siegen (DE)
Universität Siegen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.