Keep ’em in the river! Reconsider irrigation water diversion policies to avoid salmon deaths

ABSTRACT Across western North America, juvenile salmon and other migratory fish are killed in irrigation systems, which has population-level impacts for species at risk. How to reduce or prevent these deaths is an important policy issue. Federal policy in the United States requires that fish be screened from water withdrawn from rivers containing salmon and prescribes screen designs in irrigation canals to return fish to the river. A recently published study demonstrated that juvenile salmon survival was 10–37% lower for fish that entered a diversion channel and were screened and returned to the river compared to fish that remained in the river and were passed over a diversion dam. An independent study demonstrated that hydraulic patterns at in-river screening structures can allow most fish to bypass the water withdrawal and remain in the river, whereas screens in irrigation canals stressfully concentrate the fish before sending them back to the river, where they are especially vulnerable to predation. Present policies favoring in-canal screening warrant re-examination to include in-river screening methods that can increase fish survival by keeping them in the river.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fisheries
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fshmag/vuaf093
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keep ’em in the river! Reconsider irrigation water diversion policies to avoid salmon deaths

Benjamin D. Mater, Charles C. Coutant
Fisheries
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Keep ’em in the river! Reconsider irrigation water diversion policies to avoid salmon deaths

Benjamin D. Mater, Charles C. Coutant
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Across western North America, juvenile salmon and other migratory fish are killed in irrigation systems, which has population-level impacts for species at risk. How to reduce or prevent these deaths is an important policy issue. Federal policy in the United States requires that fish be screened from water withdrawn from rivers containing salmon and prescribes screen designs in irrigation canals to return fish to the river. A recently published study demonstrated that juvenile salmon survival was 10–37% lower for fish that entered a diversion channel and were screened and returned to the river compared to fish that remained in the river and were passed over a diversion dam. An independent study demonstrated that hydraulic patterns at in-river screening structures can allow most fish to bypass the water withdrawal and remain in the river, whereas screens in irrigation canals stressfully concentrate the fish before sending them back to the river, where they are especially vulnerable to predation. Present policies favoring in-canal screening warrant re-examination to include in-river screening methods that can increase fish survival by keeping them in the river.

Fisheries
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Flow Pharma (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.