Understanding and Anticipating Anomalous Surface Impacts During Large‐Scale Regimes

ABSTRACT Weather regimes describe the large‐scale atmospheric circulation in the mid‐latitudes in terms of a few circulation states that modulate regional surface weather conditions on time scales of multiple days to a few weeks. This low‐dimensional representation of weather has proven useful for the study of large‐scale dynamics, climate trends, flow‐dependent predictability, and as proxies for applied medium‐ to extended‐range forecasting in the energy sector, for example. Previous studies have often focused on the mean surface weather associated with a regime, with only a few commenting quantitatively on intra‐regime variability. In this paper, we comprehensively quantify variability of daily surface weather within regimes and show that it cannot be ignored as mean‐composite approaches can be misleading. Signal‐to‐noise metrics highlight regime configurations that provide windows of predictive opportunity, where surface dynamics are well controlled by the large‐scale regime. We discuss in detail wintertime temperature and wind speed regime anomalies for four selected countries (Spain, Norway, Germany, and the United Kingdom) and show that in each case there is impactful intra‐regime variability that can be explained by different subtypes and life cycle stages of a regime. This nuance can be captured by continuous regime indices, allowing a refined application of weather regimes on the pan‐European scale. This relatively simple guidance on regime interpretation and operational use comes without the need to change the underlying regime framework. An accompanying interactive archive, documenting intra‐regime variability in national‐scale, energy‐relevant variables, supports immediate practical application of our regime analysis for all European countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteorological Applications
Published
2025-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70099
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and Anticipating Anomalous Surface Impacts During Large‐Scale Regimes

Joshua Dorrington, Marisol Osman, Christian M. Grams, Fabian Mockert et al.
1 citations
Meteorological Applications
Climate variability and models
1.11
article

Understanding and Anticipating Anomalous Surface Impacts During Large‐Scale Regimes

Joshua Dorrington, Marisol Osman, Christian M. Grams, Fabian Mockert, Judith Gerighausen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Weather regimes describe the large‐scale atmospheric circulation in the mid‐latitudes in terms of a few circulation states that modulate regional surface weather conditions on time scales of multiple days to a few weeks. This low‐dimensional representation of weather has proven useful for the study of large‐scale dynamics, climate trends, flow‐dependent predictability, and as proxies for applied medium‐ to extended‐range forecasting in the energy sector, for example. Previous studies have often focused on the mean surface weather associated with a regime, with only a few commenting quantitatively on intra‐regime variability. In this paper, we comprehensively quantify variability of daily surface weather within regimes and show that it cannot be ignored as mean‐composite approaches can be misleading. Signal‐to‐noise metrics highlight regime configurations that provide windows of predictive opportunity, where surface dynamics are well controlled by the large‐scale regime. We discuss in detail wintertime temperature and wind speed regime anomalies for four selected countries (Spain, Norway, Germany, and the United Kingdom) and show that in each case there is impactful intra‐regime variability that can be explained by different subtypes and life cycle stages of a regime. This nuance can be captured by continuous regime indices, allowing a refined application of weather regimes on the pan‐European scale. This relatively simple guidance on regime interpretation and operational use comes without the need to change the underlying regime framework. An accompanying interactive archive, documenting intra‐regime variability in national‐scale, energy‐relevant variables, supports immediate practical application of our regime analysis for all European countries.

Meteorological ApplicationsVol. 32(6)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss (CH), Instituto Franco-Argentino sobre Estudios de Clima y sus Impactos (AR), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Climate variability and models
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.