Assessing the Quality of Community Jury Deliberations in Online and In‐Person Community Juries Using a Deductive Coding Framework

Four PPI representatives, who represented people with different characteristics, including a personal history of cancer, were involved throughout this research. Their contribution included the formation of the research question for the funding application, design of participant-facing aspects of the research, such as presentations used within the juries, and creation of lay summaries of findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70486
Primary Topic
Jury Decision Making Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Quality of Community Jury Deliberations in Online and In‐Person Community Juries Using a Deductive Coding Framework

Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Lily C. Taylor, Rebecca A. Dennison, Hanan Abukmail
Health Expectations
Jury Decision Making Processes
article

Assessing the Quality of Community Jury Deliberations in Online and In‐Person Community Juries Using a Deductive Coding Framework

Juliet A. Usher‐Smith, Lily C. Taylor, Rebecca A. Dennison, Hanan Abukmail
article en

Abstract

Four PPI representatives, who represented people with different characteristics, including a personal history of cancer, were involved throughout this research. Their contribution included the formation of the research question for the funding application, design of participant-facing aspects of the research, such as presentations used within the juries, and creation of lay summaries of findings.

Health ExpectationsVol. 28(6)
University of Cambridge (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Jury Decision Making Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.