Evaluation and Comparison of Three Common Methods for PFAS Extraction from Soybean Tissues

This study evaluated three methods, methyl <i>tert</i>-butyl ether-sodium hydroxide (MTBE-NaOH) method, EPA method 1633, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) chemical analytical manual (CAM) method C-010.03, for their effectiveness in extracting PFAS from soybean tissues. EPA method 1633 consistently delivered the highest and most reproducible EIS recoveries when plant tissues contained PFAS at low levels. Regarding target PFAS extraction efficiency, EPA method 1633 also demonstrated superior performance at environmentally relevant low concentrations. At higher PFAS concentrations in plant tissues, no single method clearly dominated; however, EPA method 1633 remained consistently reliable and was never significantly outperformed by the other two methods. Overall, EPA method 1633 is recommended as the default method for routine analyses at typical environmental PFAS levels, with MTBE-NaOH method preferred when accurate isotopic correction based on EIS recovery is critical in highly contaminated plant samples. A cost comparison of these three methods further supports the preference for EPA Method 1633 and MTBE-NaOH method for plant-tissue analyses. These findings contribute to PFAS risk assessment in agricultural and food safety contexts by enhancing the understanding of PFAS interactions with edible crops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Agricultural Science & Technology
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.5c00518
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Comparison of Three Common Methods for PFAS Extraction from Soybean Tissues

Yuwei Zuo, Madhav Kharel, Weilan Zhang
ACS Agricultural Science & Technology
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
article

Evaluation and Comparison of Three Common Methods for PFAS Extraction from Soybean Tissues

Yuwei Zuo, Madhav Kharel, Weilan Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated three methods, methyl <i>tert</i>-butyl ether-sodium hydroxide (MTBE-NaOH) method, EPA method 1633, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) chemical analytical manual (CAM) method C-010.03, for their effectiveness in extracting PFAS from soybean tissues. EPA method 1633 consistently delivered the highest and most reproducible EIS recoveries when plant tissues contained PFAS at low levels. Regarding target PFAS extraction efficiency, EPA method 1633 also demonstrated superior performance at environmentally relevant low concentrations. At higher PFAS concentrations in plant tissues, no single method clearly dominated; however, EPA method 1633 remained consistently reliable and was never significantly outperformed by the other two methods. Overall, EPA method 1633 is recommended as the default method for routine analyses at typical environmental PFAS levels, with MTBE-NaOH method preferred when accurate isotopic correction based on EIS recovery is critical in highly contaminated plant samples. A cost comparison of these three methods further supports the preference for EPA Method 1633 and MTBE-NaOH method for plant-tissue analyses. These findings contribute to PFAS risk assessment in agricultural and food safety contexts by enhancing the understanding of PFAS interactions with edible crops.

ACS Agricultural Science & TechnologyVol. 6(3)
Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Sustainable Innovation (Sweden) (SE), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Sustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation and Comparison of Three Common Methods for PFAS Extraction from Soybean Tissues — Yuwei Zuo, Madhav Kharel, et al. · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS