Global performance benchmarking of artificial intelligence models in atmospheric river forecasting

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence models is expanding the frontiers of weather forecasting, underscoring the need for comprehensive evaluations in specific applications to ensure their effective use and guide future development. Here we benchmark five state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models for forecasting atmospheric rivers, assessing both meteorological fields and atmospheric river-related metrics across global and regional scales. Results show that FuXi achieves the best performance at a 10-day lead time for meteorological fields and atmospheric river forecasts globally. However, regional assessments reveal that the model incorporating numerical components—NeuralGCM—performs better in predicting atmospheric river intensity. Two case studies along the North and South American coasts further highlight NeuralGCM’s superior ability to predict atmospheric river shapes and intensities at 10-day lead times. Nonetheless, accurately predicting atmospheric river landfall locations beyond one week remains a challenge, emphasizing the need for refinement of these models for region-specific forecasts in future applications. AI models show promise in forecasting atmospheric rivers, with FuXi excelling globally at 10-day lead times for specific humidity and horizontal winds, while NeuralGCM performs better regionally in predicting intensity, according to a comparison of five state-of-the-art models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02823-y
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global performance benchmarking of artificial intelligence models in atmospheric river forecasting

Yang Zhao, Mengqian Lu, Jing Yang, Lujia Zhang et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Global performance benchmarking of artificial intelligence models in atmospheric river forecasting

Yang Zhao, Mengqian Lu, Jing Yang, Lujia Zhang, Qing Bao
article en

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence models is expanding the frontiers of weather forecasting, underscoring the need for comprehensive evaluations in specific applications to ensure their effective use and guide future development. Here we benchmark five state-of-the-art artificial intelligence models for forecasting atmospheric rivers, assessing both meteorological fields and atmospheric river-related metrics across global and regional scales. Results show that FuXi achieves the best performance at a 10-day lead time for meteorological fields and atmospheric river forecasts globally. However, regional assessments reveal that the model incorporating numerical components—NeuralGCM—performs better in predicting atmospheric river intensity. Two case studies along the North and South American coasts further highlight NeuralGCM’s superior ability to predict atmospheric river shapes and intensities at 10-day lead times. Nonetheless, accurately predicting atmospheric river landfall locations beyond one week remains a challenge, emphasizing the need for refinement of these models for region-specific forecasts in future applications. AI models show promise in forecasting atmospheric rivers, with FuXi excelling globally at 10-day lead times for specific humidity and horizontal winds, while NeuralGCM performs better regionally in predicting intensity, according to a comparison of five state-of-the-art models.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Beijing Normal University (CN), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), Ocean University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.