Generative AI for Lateral Movement Modeling in Comparison to Classical Modeling Approaches

The lateral offset between vehicles is a decisive input for sensor range of vision estimation and thus a relevant parameter for the maximum situational awareness an automated driving function relying on such sensors can achieve. With simulations playing an integral role in the validation process of automated driving functions, the ability to realistically model the lateral movement of vehicles within their lane is crucial. Previous studies therefore proposed models for lateral movement modeling based on stochastic differential equations and twolevel approaches combining a Markov model and a noise model. Within this work, we present a deep state space model for generating lateral movement profiles and compare it with the previously mentioned classical approaches. The deep state space model outperforms the models based on stochastic differential equations. While it does not reach the performance of the two-level model in every regard and also does not fulfill all requirements on lateral movement modeling identified, it achieves a high accuracy with strengths different from the two-level model. It is therefore a valuable enhancement for lateral movement modeling and can serve as a reference for evaluating classical approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iavvc61942.2025.11219531
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI for Lateral Movement Modeling in Comparison to Classical Modeling Approaches

A. Müller, Jürgen Beyerer, Nicole Neis, Thao Dang
1 citations
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
article

Generative AI for Lateral Movement Modeling in Comparison to Classical Modeling Approaches

A. Müller, Jürgen Beyerer, Nicole Neis, Thao Dang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The lateral offset between vehicles is a decisive input for sensor range of vision estimation and thus a relevant parameter for the maximum situational awareness an automated driving function relying on such sensors can achieve. With simulations playing an integral role in the validation process of automated driving functions, the ability to realistically model the lateral movement of vehicles within their lane is crucial. Previous studies therefore proposed models for lateral movement modeling based on stochastic differential equations and twolevel approaches combining a Markov model and a noise model. Within this work, we present a deep state space model for generating lateral movement profiles and compare it with the previously mentioned classical approaches. The deep state space model outperforms the models based on stochastic differential equations. While it does not reach the performance of the two-level model in every regard and also does not fulfill all requirements on lateral movement modeling identified, it achieves a high accuracy with strengths different from the two-level model. It is therefore a valuable enhancement for lateral movement modeling and can serve as a reference for evaluating classical approaches.

Esslingen University of Applied Sciences (DE), Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI for Lateral Movement Modeling in Comparison to Classical Modeling Approaches — A. Müller, Jürgen Beyerer, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS