Revised standard weight equation and length categories for Spotted Bass and new proposed standard weight equation and length categories for Alabama Bass

ABSTRACT Objective Spotted Bass Micropterus punctulatus and Alabama Bass M. henshalli have been recognized as separate species for close to two decades, yet they continue to be managed as a single species under the same standard weight (Ws) equation and length categories despite known differences in body form and growth potential. The objective of this study was to develop and assess new Ws equations and length categories for proportional size distribution indices to better inform management decisions for each species. Methods Length and weight data for Alabama Bass were obtained from 32 populations across six states, totaling 41,341 individuals; data for Spotted Bass were obtained from 127 populations across 11 states, totaling 86,602 individuals. Using these data, three new Ws equations were created for both species with the regression line percentile, empirical percentile–linear (EmP-L), and empirical percentile–quadratic techniques. New standard length categories were derived from the current International Game Fish Association world record for Alabama Bass and from the mean of state records from 10 states for Spotted Bass. Results For Alabama Bass, all three techniques produced reasonable Ws equations that dramatically outperformed the old equation. For both species, the EmP-L and empirical percentile–quadratic equations displayed less length bias in relative weight estimates than the regression line percentile equation, but neither empirical percentile equation was notably superior. Therefore, we propose that the new Ws equations for both species should be the simpler EmP-L version following the suggestions of previous studies. With total length (TL) in millimeters and weight (WT) in grams, the Alabama Bass equation is log10(WT) = −5.6189 + 3.284·log10(TL) and the Spotted Bass equation is log10(WT) = −5.3467 + 3.197·log10(TL). The old standard length categories proposed for Spotted Bass should be retained for Alabama Bass; those values are 180, 280, 350, 430, and 510 mm TL, representing stock, quality, preferred, memorable, and trophy categories, respectively. For Spotted Bass, we propose the following standard length categories: 150, 230, 300, 350, and 440 mm TL, respectively. Conclusions These Ws equations and standard length categories better match the body form and growth potential of both species and will provide biologists with improved tools to monitor the condition and size structure of these important sport fishes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt/vqaf097
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revised standard weight equation and length categories for Spotted Bass and new proposed standard weight equation and length categories for Alabama Bass

Angela Harris, Steven M. Sammons, Michael E. Jolley, Jeremy T Risely
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Revised standard weight equation and length categories for Spotted Bass and new proposed standard weight equation and length categories for Alabama Bass

Angela Harris, Steven M. Sammons, Michael E. Jolley, Jeremy T Risely
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Spotted Bass Micropterus punctulatus and Alabama Bass M. henshalli have been recognized as separate species for close to two decades, yet they continue to be managed as a single species under the same standard weight (Ws) equation and length categories despite known differences in body form and growth potential. The objective of this study was to develop and assess new Ws equations and length categories for proportional size distribution indices to better inform management decisions for each species. Methods Length and weight data for Alabama Bass were obtained from 32 populations across six states, totaling 41,341 individuals; data for Spotted Bass were obtained from 127 populations across 11 states, totaling 86,602 individuals. Using these data, three new Ws equations were created for both species with the regression line percentile, empirical percentile–linear (EmP-L), and empirical percentile–quadratic techniques. New standard length categories were derived from the current International Game Fish Association world record for Alabama Bass and from the mean of state records from 10 states for Spotted Bass. Results For Alabama Bass, all three techniques produced reasonable Ws equations that dramatically outperformed the old equation. For both species, the EmP-L and empirical percentile–quadratic equations displayed less length bias in relative weight estimates than the regression line percentile equation, but neither empirical percentile equation was notably superior. Therefore, we propose that the new Ws equations for both species should be the simpler EmP-L version following the suggestions of previous studies. With total length (TL) in millimeters and weight (WT) in grams, the Alabama Bass equation is log10(WT) = −5.6189 + 3.284·log10(TL) and the Spotted Bass equation is log10(WT) = −5.3467 + 3.197·log10(TL). The old standard length categories proposed for Spotted Bass should be retained for Alabama Bass; those values are 180, 280, 350, 430, and 510 mm TL, representing stock, quality, preferred, memorable, and trophy categories, respectively. For Spotted Bass, we propose the following standard length categories: 150, 230, 300, 350, and 440 mm TL, respectively. Conclusions These Ws equations and standard length categories better match the body form and growth potential of both species and will provide biologists with improved tools to monitor the condition and size structure of these important sport fishes.

North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Illinois Department of Natural Resources (US), Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Arkansas State University Mountain Home (US), University of Illinois System (US), Aquatic Systems (United States) (US), Illinois Archaeological Survey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.